Objective: To determine the willingness of parents of children visiting a pediatric emergency department to have a physician assistant (PA) assess and treat their child and the waiting time reduction sufficient for them to choose to receive treatment by a PA rather than wait for a physician. Method: After describing the training and scope of practice of PAs, we asked caregivers of children triaged as urgent to nonurgent if they would be willing to have their child assessed and treated by a PA on that visit: definitely, maybe, or never. We also asked the minimum amount of waiting time reduction they would want to see before choosing to receive treatment by a PA rather than wait for a physician. Result: We approached 320 eligible subjects, and 273 (85.3%) consented to participate. Regarding whether they would be willing to have their child receive treatment by a PA, 140 (51.3%) respondents answered definitely, 107 (39.2%) said maybe, and 26 (9.2%) said never. Most respondents (64.1%) would choose to have their child seen by a PA instead of waiting for a physician if the waiting time reduction were at least 60 minutes (median 60 minutes [interquartile range 60 minutes]). Respondents' perception of the severity of their child's condition was associated with unwillingness to receive treatment by a PA, whereas child's age, presenting complaint, and actual waiting time were not. Conclusion: Only a small minority of parents of children visiting a pediatric emergency department for urgent to nonurgent issues are unwilling to have their child treated by PAs.
RÉ SUMÉObjectifs: L'é tude visait à dé terminer dans quelle mesure des parents é taient disposé s à voir leur enfant examiné et traité par un assistant mé decin (AM) au service des urgences pé diatriques, et à quantifier le gain minimal de temps pour que ceux-ci acceptent de rencontrer un AM plutô t qu'un mé decin. Mé thode: Aprè s avoir dé crit la formation des AM et l'é tendue de leur pratique, nous avons demandé à des parents d'enfants considé ré s comme des cas urgents, moins urgents, ou non urgents s'ils accepteraient de voir leur enfant é valué et traité par un AM pour la consultation en cours selon l'é chelle suivante: certainement, peut-ê tre, jamais. Nous leur avons é galement demandé combien de temps ils devraient gagner au minimum pour qu'ils acceptent de rencontrer un AM plutô t qu'un mé decin. Ré sultats: Sur 320 sujets admissibles, 273 (85.3%) ont accepté de participer à l'é tude. En ce qui concerne le consentement des parents à voir leur enfant traité par un AM, 140 (51.3%) ont ré pondu certainement; 107 (39.2%), peut-ê tre; et 26 (9.2%), jamais. La plupart des parents (64.1%) ont ré pondu qu'ils pré fé reraient voir leur enfant examiné par un AM plutô t que d'attendre un mé decin si le gain de temps é tait d'au moins 60 minutes (attente mé diane: 60 minutes [intervalle interquartile: 60 minutes]). La perception du degré de gravité de la maladie par les ré pondants a é té associé e au refus de voir l'enfant traité par un AM, contrairement à d'au...