Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Neck and shoulder disorders often occur side by side and reinforce each other in their clinical manifestations. Differential diagnosis of neck and shoulder pain can be challenging due to the close anatomical proximity, innervation of neck and shoulder structures, similarity of symptoms and groups of patients suffering from these conditions. Identifying the anatomical source of pain is the most important clinical task when choosing treatment for patients, which is reflected in two clinical observations. In the first clinical case the main complaint was pain in the shoulder; a neuro-orthopedic examination revealed evidence of radicular involvement in the form of a decrease in tendon reflex, pain provocation in Spurling and tension tests, with no evidence of involvement or pain in the joint structures of the shoulder. MRI of the cervical spine revealed signs of CVI discoradicular conflict consistent with the clinical symptoms. In the second observation, the main complaint was pain in the cervical spine and right shoulder, initially considered as radiculopathy; MRI revealed degenerative changes in the spine with possible compression of the CVI root. Neuro-orthopedic examination revealed no signs of radicular lesions; the main anatomical source of pain was coraco-acromial joint involvement, which was confirmed by diagnostic blockade of this joint. Both non-drug methods (kinesiotherapy, manual therapy, ergonomic measures) and medications (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — Airtal; muscle relaxants — Mydocalm) were used; therapeutic blockades targeting the main source of pain were performed. The cases presented show that it is impossible to determine the main anatomical source of pain based on the pain pattern. It can be determined by a thorough analysis of medical history and a detailed neuro-orthopedic examination. Neuroimaging methods should only be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture. In controversial cases, diagnostic blockades with local anesthetics can be performed to confirm the diagnosis.
Neck and shoulder disorders often occur side by side and reinforce each other in their clinical manifestations. Differential diagnosis of neck and shoulder pain can be challenging due to the close anatomical proximity, innervation of neck and shoulder structures, similarity of symptoms and groups of patients suffering from these conditions. Identifying the anatomical source of pain is the most important clinical task when choosing treatment for patients, which is reflected in two clinical observations. In the first clinical case the main complaint was pain in the shoulder; a neuro-orthopedic examination revealed evidence of radicular involvement in the form of a decrease in tendon reflex, pain provocation in Spurling and tension tests, with no evidence of involvement or pain in the joint structures of the shoulder. MRI of the cervical spine revealed signs of CVI discoradicular conflict consistent with the clinical symptoms. In the second observation, the main complaint was pain in the cervical spine and right shoulder, initially considered as radiculopathy; MRI revealed degenerative changes in the spine with possible compression of the CVI root. Neuro-orthopedic examination revealed no signs of radicular lesions; the main anatomical source of pain was coraco-acromial joint involvement, which was confirmed by diagnostic blockade of this joint. Both non-drug methods (kinesiotherapy, manual therapy, ergonomic measures) and medications (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — Airtal; muscle relaxants — Mydocalm) were used; therapeutic blockades targeting the main source of pain were performed. The cases presented show that it is impossible to determine the main anatomical source of pain based on the pain pattern. It can be determined by a thorough analysis of medical history and a detailed neuro-orthopedic examination. Neuroimaging methods should only be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture. In controversial cases, diagnostic blockades with local anesthetics can be performed to confirm the diagnosis.
Treatment of patients with chest pain (thoracalgia) is a current medical issue. The most common cause of thoracalgia is a benign musculoskeletal pain such as intercostal myofascial pain, facet syndrome and osteoarthritis of the sternocostal joints. However, chest pain can also be caused by life-threatening conditions that require emergent medical care. The article presents the clinical symptoms and treatment approaches for various chest pain syndromes and the principles of differential diagnosis of cardiac pain. The basis of effective treatment is a comprehensive approach that includes patient education about the benign nature of the condition, kinesiotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. Among the drug methods, the prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is the most important. Nimesulide is an NSAID with an optimal profile of efficacy and safety. The example of a clinical case shows the heterogeneity of pain syndromes in patients with chest pain, whose timely diagnosis and complex treatment can prevent pain chronification and improve patients' quality of life.
Issues of diagnosis, effective treatment and prevention of chronic pain syndromes represent an urgent problem of modern medicine. About 80% of the population has experienced low back pain (LBP) at least once in their life; in 20% of patients acute LBP becomes chronic. Pain in the gluteal region with radiation to the leg can be caused by damage to various structures (joints, ligaments, deep muscles of the gluteal region, spinal roots), which are closely located and have similar innervation. The article presents a clinical case that illustrates the difficulties of diagnosing deep pain syndrome in the gluteal region in a young athlete. The condition, which was initially considered as myofascial pain syndrome of the piriformis muscle, upon detailed examination and observation turned out to be a rheumatological pathology (Bechterew’s disease). The article discusses the etiology, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis and treatment of piriformis muscle syndrome. There are currently no reliable diagnostic tests or validated diagnostic criteria to confirm the diagnosis, and therefore piriformis syndrome should be considered a diagnosis of exclusion. In clinical practice, there is both overdiagnosis of piriformis muscle syndrome with the widespread use of various invasive procedures, and ignorance of this syndrome. In most cases, secondary piriformis syndrome is observed and identification of the causative factor is decisive for the successful treatment of patients. Treatment of piriformis muscle syndrome should include the elimination of provoking factors, kinesiotherapy, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and, if indicated, therapeutic blockades, and for chronic pain syndrome, cognitive behavioral therapy and antidepressants. Nimesulide is a NSAID with proven effectiveness and a good safety profile, and therefore can be recommended for the treatment of both musculoskeletal pathologies and symptomatic treatment of rheumatological diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.