2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-2037-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patientenberichtete und patientengewichtete Endpunkte in der Augenheilkunde

Abstract: Considering patients' values and preferences in comparative effectiveness research (CER) is one of the main challenges in ophthalmology (value-based medicine). This article defines core terms in CER. The concept of patient-relevant (or patient-important) outcomes is distinguished from patient-reported outcomes (PRO) by means of examples in the field of ophthalmology. In order to be able to give a consistant recommendation if an intervention leads to conflicting results for different outcomes (trade-off), a ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 20 years, the medical sciences including ophthalmology have taken an increased interest in patient-reported outcomes, and the authors concur that patient-reported outcomes do indeed provide the physician with more ammunition for offering a more holistic approach to the overall care of our patients. 6 , 7 From the perspective of the physician, the postoperative cataract surgery patient must be evaluated initially at some point and whether it is the same-day or on a different day, the authors do not recognize any time or cost savings realized to the physician. And since the AAO preferred practice patterns provide some flexibility in regards to initial postoperative care, the authors believe it is reasonable and appropriate to take into consideration their patient’s preferences on the matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years, the medical sciences including ophthalmology have taken an increased interest in patient-reported outcomes, and the authors concur that patient-reported outcomes do indeed provide the physician with more ammunition for offering a more holistic approach to the overall care of our patients. 6 , 7 From the perspective of the physician, the postoperative cataract surgery patient must be evaluated initially at some point and whether it is the same-day or on a different day, the authors do not recognize any time or cost savings realized to the physician. And since the AAO preferred practice patterns provide some flexibility in regards to initial postoperative care, the authors believe it is reasonable and appropriate to take into consideration their patient’s preferences on the matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 The medical sciences have increasingly acknowledged the value of patient-reported outcomes during the past two decades, and the authors concur that such outcomes allow the surgeon an opportunity to provide a more complete and holistic approach to patient care. 9,10 Limited prospective patient-reported dry eye symptom outcomes following LASIK presently exist in the literature. The Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) survey is a well-defined and validated questionnaire for evaluating patient satisfaction following LASIK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 The medical sciences during the past several years have increasingly recognized the importance of patient-reported outcomes, and the authors agree that such outcomes provide the physician with an opportunity to offer a more holistic approach to the care of their patients. 20,21 The Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK Symptoms and Satisfaction (PROWL) questionnaire are a well-defined and validated survey for assessing patient satisfaction following LASIK. 22,23 Although reports using the PROWL questionnaire have been published after WG and WFO ablations, 24 there are currently no reports following TG-LASIK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%