2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients' and physicians’ perspectives on the burden and management of asthma: Results from the APPaRENT 2 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though few studies to date have assessed the adherence to MART in the real world [ 49 ], it is unlikely that patients would be more adherent to the regular component of MART compared with regular ICS/LABA regimens. Furthermore, many patients on MART regimen request additional rescue inhalers, indicating both a perceived inadequate asthma control with this regimen and a misapplication of MART dosing in clinical practice [ 50 , 51 ]. For as-needed BUD/FOR dosing, disparate clinical trial findings [ 52 55 ] have resulted in non-universal adoption by different asthma treatment guidelines and health authorities, meaning that this therapeutic option currently remains off-label for many countries [ 51 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though few studies to date have assessed the adherence to MART in the real world [ 49 ], it is unlikely that patients would be more adherent to the regular component of MART compared with regular ICS/LABA regimens. Furthermore, many patients on MART regimen request additional rescue inhalers, indicating both a perceived inadequate asthma control with this regimen and a misapplication of MART dosing in clinical practice [ 50 , 51 ]. For as-needed BUD/FOR dosing, disparate clinical trial findings [ 52 55 ] have resulted in non-universal adoption by different asthma treatment guidelines and health authorities, meaning that this therapeutic option currently remains off-label for many countries [ 51 , 56 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the finding that more physicians prioritize symptom control than exacerbation risk in patients with mild asthma [287/736 (9.0%) vs. 85/736 (11.5%), respectively] [ 72 ], since the SYGMA 1 study showed inferior symptom control with as-needed ICS-FOR versus regularly dosed ICS [ 65 , 72 ], and a retrospective matched cohort study demonstrated better symptom control with once-daily fluticasone furoate-vilanterol versus twice-daily BUD-FOR [ 73 ]. Importantly, patients receiving ICS-FOR MART remain susceptible to SABA overuse; the APPaRENT studies reported that 85.4% (479/561) of physicians prescribed SABA in addition to MART (APPaRENT 1) [ 72 ], with the same incorrect use of MART reported by 85% (521/616) of patients (APPaRENT 2) [ 74 ].…”
Section: Differences Between Treatment Guidelines and Physician Attit...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapman and others [41,42] conducted two studies to investigate how current clinical practice in various countries around the globe relates to the latest GINA recommendations, APPaRENT1 [41] and APPaRENT2 [42]. In APPaRENT1, the study team recruited patients and GPs from Australia, Canada, China, and the Philippines.…”
Section: Adopting New Changes and Poor Patient Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%