2013
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients’ expectations of deep brain stimulation, and subjective perceived outcome related to clinical measures in Parkinson's disease: a mixed-method approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
102
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Similar to our study, a prior study 7 incorporated a semi-structured interview into their methods to better understand patients' expectations and postoperative subjective perceived benefit; however, this study did not incorporate patient-reported severity ratings that would have allowed more detailed quantitative assessment of perceived benefit. In contrast, another report 8 provided detailed quantitative assessment of patients' For repeated-measures data, the F statistic is the time main effect from mixed effects regression models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,8 Similar to our study, a prior study 7 incorporated a semi-structured interview into their methods to better understand patients' expectations and postoperative subjective perceived benefit; however, this study did not incorporate patient-reported severity ratings that would have allowed more detailed quantitative assessment of perceived benefit. In contrast, another report 8 provided detailed quantitative assessment of patients' For repeated-measures data, the F statistic is the time main effect from mixed effects regression models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 Although there is consensus among some DBS teams that patients' goals for the upcoming neurosurgery should be assessed routinely, [3][4][5][6] there has been relatively little investigation of how successful DBS is in addressing patients' goals for surgery or the relationship between patients' stated goals for surgery and other standard clinical research (SCR) metrics. 7,8 Despite studies demonstrating the positive benefits of DBS on motor symptoms and quality of life, [9][10][11] some have provocatively argued that patients may not be as pleased with the outcomes of DBS as the treating physicians. 12,13 This satisfaction gap suggests that SCR measures may not fully capture patients' goals with respect to outcome and argues for the need for a more systematic assessment of patients' individually defined goals for DBS and patients' perceived satisfaction with DBS in addressing those goals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No complications were reported. A detailed description of the Cologne STN-DBS procedure can be found elsewhere [27]. To verify electrode positions, the individual anterior commissure-posterior commissure coordinates (x, y, z) of patients' electrodes were determined using the STP3 software (Stryker Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany).…”
Section: Dbs Routinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese Auswirkungen waren nicht mit dem Operationserfolg korreliert, sondern resultierten zu einem großen Teil aus dem kognitiven und psychischen Anpassungsniveau des präoperativen Zustands. Auch die Erwartungen, die subjektive Lebensbilanz und die partnerschaftliche Situation determinierten entscheidend die bewerteten Langzeiteffekte der THS -die nach objektiver Messung in der Regel hervorragend ausfielen [Maier et al, 2013;Schüpbach et al, 2006;Agid et al, 2006]. [Hind et al, 2014;Moss-Morris et al, 2013;Knoop et al, 2012].…”
Section: Das Brain-computer-interface Als Methode Der Kompensationunclassified