“…Clinical outcome measures on head and neck cancer have concentrated more on pathophysiologic and anatomical changes, and less on patients' functioning in everyday life situations (eg, communication, going shopping, personal hygiene, preparing meals, and social life), and the patient's relatedness on the environment (types of food to be eaten, products for assistance in daily living such as canula, interdependencies with family, friends and strangers, job, and financial background). [20][21][22] What was mentioned by Stucki et al in relation to rehabilitation in general seems to also apply to head and neck cancer in particular, namely, it might be worthwhile, stepping back and discussing whether a widening of our focus toward areas of patient activity, participation, and contextual environmental factors might increase patient benefit. 23,24 There is a large number of ICF categories addressed in less than 10% of the publications.…”