2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients' gender affected physicians' clinical decisions when presented with standardized patients but not for matching paper patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, our finding that Medicare payments were higher for several patient populations (women, older patients, and patients with greater comorbid illness) is not unexpected; our findings are likely a reflection of both higher complication rates for TKA in these subgroups and less social support necessitating greater reliance on home health services. [23][24][25][26] The implications of higher complication rates (and costs) for certain populations could have profound implications under a switch to bundled payments. To the extent that patients with similar sociodemographics (and risk for complications) cluster within hospitals, [27][28][29] certain hospitals could benefit by having a relatively low-risk TKA population and see profits from TKA soar; alternatively, other hospitals with a predominantly higher risk TKA population could see TKA as financially detrimental based upon geographic location and catchment area alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our finding that Medicare payments were higher for several patient populations (women, older patients, and patients with greater comorbid illness) is not unexpected; our findings are likely a reflection of both higher complication rates for TKA in these subgroups and less social support necessitating greater reliance on home health services. [23][24][25][26] The implications of higher complication rates (and costs) for certain populations could have profound implications under a switch to bundled payments. To the extent that patients with similar sociodemographics (and risk for complications) cluster within hospitals, [27][28][29] certain hospitals could benefit by having a relatively low-risk TKA population and see profits from TKA soar; alternatively, other hospitals with a predominantly higher risk TKA population could see TKA as financially detrimental based upon geographic location and catchment area alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was most striking for AfricanAmerican women, who were less likely to be referred for cardiac catheterization than Caucasian men [29]. In a simulated study [3], orthopaedic physicians also have been implicated in preferentially advising TKA to men. Likewise, disparate rates of complications may confound outcomes across demographics: SooHoo et al [32] reported an association between African-Americans and thromboembolic complications and Hispanics and infectious complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one study evaluating the role of utilization of TKA in female patients reported both primary care physicians and orthopaedic surgeons were less likely to recommend TKA for a standardized woman actor with moderate OA compared with a male actor with moderate OA and similar presentation [6]. In addition, another study not related to THA or TKA demonstrated physicians were less likely to recommend cardiac catheterization for African American male and female actors compared with non-Hispanic white actors presenting with identical history and findings [42].…”
Section: Patient and Provider Factors Contributing To Tja Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%