2000
DOI: 10.1076/0360-5310(200004)25:2;1-o;ft240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients or Customers: Ethical Limits of Market Economy in Health Care

Abstract: There is a move away from a market economy in health care in the United States and a move towards such a market in Germany. This article tries to make explicit what underlies the moral intuition that there is a tension between a market economy and health care. First, health care is analyzed in terms of the economic theory of the market and incompatibilities are described. The moral problem is identified as the danger of liquefying the distinction between persons and things. The basic moral intuition seems to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients without medical insurance showed lower responsibility, which is probably related to the materialistic nature of the patient–provider relationship. These patients may treat the patient–provider relationship as a buyer–seller relationship [4344]; correspondingly, they may consider that the extent of their responsibility to the provider is to pay the fee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients without medical insurance showed lower responsibility, which is probably related to the materialistic nature of the patient–provider relationship. These patients may treat the patient–provider relationship as a buyer–seller relationship [4344]; correspondingly, they may consider that the extent of their responsibility to the provider is to pay the fee.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many, health care provision is a moral issue and private provision -implying as it does that profits should be made from the health needs of others -is argued to be morally inferior to public provision (see, for example, Heubel, 2000;Le Grand, 2001;Matthews, 1998). This argument may be of intellectual interest, but it is a complete non sequitur when in reality the choice is between two systems of health care provision, one of which offers a level of efficiency that the other cannot match and therefore provides a higher standard of care at the same cost.…”
Section: The Socialist Calculation Debatementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such free-rider considerations may explain a great deal of the predominant attitude toward insurance in Germany and The Netherlands (Heubel, 2000;Kirkman-Liff, 1991). All non-indigent, low and middle income citizens are expected to insure themselves.…”
Section: Free-riding and Compulsory Universal Insurancementioning
confidence: 98%