Patients’ perception of recovery after exposure of impacted teeth: A comparison of closed- versus open-eruption techniques

Chaushu, Stella; Becker, Adrian; Zeltser, Rephael; Branski, Sari; Vasker, Naomi; Chaushu, Gavriel

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2004.11.007

Cited by 79 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three patients in the Closed group and six patients in the Open group reported that the pain lasted for more than several days, but this was not statistically significant. This result does not agree with the findings of Chaushu et al 13 , who found that there was a reduced need for analgesics in the Closed group after day two. However it does support the findings of Gharaibeh and Al-Nimri 12 who also found no significant difference in the two groups with regard to magnitude and duration of pain.…”

Section: Patient-based Outcomescontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…A prospective, cohort study involving 60 patients treated with either the Open or Closed surgical technique carried out by Chaushu and colleagues 13 reported longer mean operating times than the present study (Closed: 36.4 mins, SD 17.3; Open 44.6 mins, SD 15.2). However their participants had a range of ectopic teeth (including 14 impacted central incisors) and they provide no details about the experience of the operator.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

See 1 more Smart Citation

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Open and Closed Exposure of Palatally Displaced Maxillary Canines

Parkin

Deery

Smith

et al. 2012

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

No difference in surgical outcomes between Open and Closed exposure of palatally displaced maxillary cuspids Abstract Purpose: To investigate differences in the surgical outcomes between Open and Closed exposure for palatally displaced maxillary cuspids (PDC).Methods: A multicenter, RCT involving two parallel groups. The settings were one dental teaching hospital in, and two hospital units near Sheffield, UK. Participants were aged <20 years with a unilateral PDC, who provided informed consent. They were randomly allocated to either receive the Open (O) or the Closed (C) surgical procedure. The outcomes were time spent in the operating room and 10-day post-operative patient questionnaire. Statistical differences between the two techniques were tested using independent t tests for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for frequencies.Results: The final study sample was composed of 71 participants (64% females). There were no differences in the gender ratios (O: F=27, M=13; C: F=25, M=16) or mean ages of the two groups (O: 14.3 yrs SD 1.3; C: 14.1 yrs SD 1.6) at the start. The mean operating times for the Open and Closed techniques were 34.3 mins (SD 11.2) and 34.3 mins (SD 11.9) respectively (p=.986). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups for any of the patientassessed outcomes (p>.05).Conclusions: There were no differences in the surgical outcomes investigated in this study between Open and Closed exposure for PDC.

show abstract

Section: Patient-based Outcomescontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 66%

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Open and Closed Exposure of Palatally Displaced Maxillary Canines

Parkin

Deery

Smith

et al. 2012

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4,5 Researchers have therefore suggested that OHRQOL be included when assessing a patient's treatment needs and outcomes. 4,[6][7][8][9] In orthodontics, researchers have assessed OHRQOL in connection with orthodontic treatment outcomes, such as in studies of how patients' QOL is affected by improvements in appearance and functioning after treatment is concluded. [4][5][6][10][11][12] However, research on orthodontic patients' QOL during their treatment is scarce.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain and Orthodontic Treatment

Krukemeyer

Arruda

Inglehart

2009

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e) The distance between the cusp of the impacted canine and the occlusal plane. [3] The criteria to evaluate the position of the impacted canine. a.…”

Section: Prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Traction to the gold chain is reactivated every 4-6 weeks by removing links of chain and retying the chain to the traction arch wire. [3] Retention Considerations Backer et al evaluated the post treatment results of the impacted canines in patients whose orthodontic treatment had been completed. They observed an increased incidence of rotations and spacings on the impacted side in 17.4% of the cases, whereas on the control side the incidence was only 8.7%.…”

Section: Rare Earth Magnets and Impactionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillary Canine Impactions: Orthodontic and Surgical Management

Jarjoura

Crespo²,

Fine³

2016

AIMDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Canines are important teeth in terms of esthetic and function. The Maxillary Canines are also known as 'Corner stone of smiles' or 'Eye teeth'. Impaction of canines is a common occurrence and clinicians must have a sound knowledge to manage such cases. Dachi and Howell reported that the incidence of maxillary canine impaction is 0.92%, and mandibular canine impaction is 0.35% among which 8% patients bilateral impactions. No prosthesis can match the originality of contour, shape and color of original canine. So every attempt should be made to retrieve the impacted canine. With early detection, timely interception and well managed surgical and orthodontic treatment; impacted canines can be erupted and guided to an appropriate location in the dental arch. This paper presents a literature review regarding etiology, clinical and radiographic diagnosis, as well as surgical and orthodontic management of impacted canine along with case presentations.

show abstract

Patients’ perception of recovery after exposure of impacted teeth: A comparison of closed- versus open-eruption techniques

Cited by 79 publications

References 8 publications

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Open and Closed Exposure of Palatally Displaced Maxillary Canines

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Open and Closed Exposure of Palatally Displaced Maxillary Canines

Pain and Orthodontic Treatment

Maxillary Canine Impactions: Orthodontic and Surgical Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About