2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.865046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients' Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic: The Relationship Between Potential Pandemic-Induced Disruptions, Ontological Security, and Adaptive Responses in Taizhou, China

Abstract: BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has changed the social environment of most individuals around the world and has profoundly impacted people's lives, ontological security, and behavior. Among them, the patients are one of the groups most influenced by the pandemic.ObjectiveThe present research aimed to study the relationship of COVID-19 pandemic-induced disruption to patients' daily lives, ontological security, and patients' responses to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and explore the role of ontological securit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the surface, the patients and the relatives seem content with the provided care; however, these expressions could also be interpreted as efforts to adapt to an uncontrollable situation. Lou et al [32] describe COVID-19 as life-threatening and disruptive to lives of individuals and how patients' adaptive responses with good behavior during healthcare contacts. They also suggest a need for HCPs to focus on patients' ontological security.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the surface, the patients and the relatives seem content with the provided care; however, these expressions could also be interpreted as efforts to adapt to an uncontrollable situation. Lou et al [32] describe COVID-19 as life-threatening and disruptive to lives of individuals and how patients' adaptive responses with good behavior during healthcare contacts. They also suggest a need for HCPs to focus on patients' ontological security.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire comprised 3 parts: (1) demographic information, including age, sex, residence, education, and occupation, and (2) an ontological insecurity scale. 21 , 22 The scale consists of 9 items, each answered on a Likert-type scale with “strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree,” counting for 0 to 4 points, respectively. The scores of each item are added to obtain the total score of this category; the total score range is 0 to 36.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%