1995
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7017.1395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients who reattend after head injury: a high risk group

Abstract: All patients who reattend after head injury should undergo computed tomography as at least 14% of scans can be expected to yield positive results. Where this facility is not available patients with predictors for operation should be urgently referred for neurosurgical opinion. Other patients can be readmitted and need referral only if symptoms persist despite symptomatic treatment or there is neurological deterioration while under observation. These patients are a high risk group and should be treated seriousl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One study, however, would suggest that up to 5% of patients with these late findings will eventually need urgent neurosurgical intervention. 25 With these conflicting study results, an argument can be made that there is some merit in finding pathology in the patient with a delayed presentation following head trauma. Patients found to have an abnormality on CT may need hospitalization to detect early mental status decline should complications develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One study, however, would suggest that up to 5% of patients with these late findings will eventually need urgent neurosurgical intervention. 25 With these conflicting study results, an argument can be made that there is some merit in finding pathology in the patient with a delayed presentation following head trauma. Patients found to have an abnormality on CT may need hospitalization to detect early mental status decline should complications develop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen percent of patients had an abnormality other than skull fracture on CT scan. 25 It is difficult to know whether the 17% rate of pathology found applies to a population with delayed presentation or applies only to those who receive an initial evaluation (without a CT) and then return due to worsening symptoms. It is possible that the group who waited to be seen had milder initial trauma, which is why they did not think it was worthwhile to come for medical evaluation immediately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The diagnostic value of clinical and radiologic variables for these complications has been subject to recent, comprehensive studies and reviews. 9,16,25,26 Though, there is a lack of information about the prevalence and time pattern of delayed, intracranial complications in MTBI patients as well as about the reliability of an early [27][28][29] CT scan without abnormalities with regard to any later deterioration. 6,18,24,26,30 Available data indicate that delayed complications are rare in patients with an ordinary brain concussion, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%