2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02815.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients with irritable bowel syndrome in primary care appear not to be heavy healthcare utilizers

Abstract: SUMMARY BackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome is a frequently diagnosed gastrointestinal condition in general practice. Managing this chronic condition requires a co-ordinated effort between patient and doctor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A population-based case-control design was used for the LIPS [23,24,25,26]. The IBS cases were recruited from Swedish primary health care centres (PHC) on the basis of diagnoses stored in computerized medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A population-based case-control design was used for the LIPS [23,24,25,26]. The IBS cases were recruited from Swedish primary health care centres (PHC) on the basis of diagnoses stored in computerized medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of the disease could vary from mild or moderate to severe. The collection of baseline data from the IBS patients has been described elsewhere [24,25,26]. By using the local census population register N=4,500 controls in the age-group 18-65 years were randomly selected from the general population in same geographical area as the IBS cases.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The total number of individuals aged 18 to 65 years for the control group (N = 4500) was selected proportionally, based on the size of the actual population living in each of the 3 primary health care areas. 17,18 In 2003, a questionnaire was mailed to the 5000 individuals included in the study (500 patients with FD and 4500 controls). Of these, 25 patients with FD and 73 controls had an unknown address or had died, and the study then comprised 4902 individuals (475 patients with FD and 4427 controls).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%