2017
DOI: 10.18820/24150479/aa49i2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patronage, state capture and oligopolistic monopoly in South Africa: The slide from a weak to a dysfunctional state?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In South Africa, where US$78bn (ZAR 1.5tn) was lost to corruption from 2014 to 2019, most losses have been attributed to state funds embezzled through state capture (Buthelezi, 2021). Labuschagne (2017) describe state capture as a state being captured by external third parties manipulating primary government functions at the expense of social welfare. A study conducted by Global Financial Integrity (GFI) assigns the composition of IFFs to three main contributors, with corruption contributing 5%, the proceeds of commercial tax avoidance at 65% and criminal activities at 30% (Mustafa et al, 2019).…”
Section: Illegal Financial Flows and Mis-invoicing In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South Africa, where US$78bn (ZAR 1.5tn) was lost to corruption from 2014 to 2019, most losses have been attributed to state funds embezzled through state capture (Buthelezi, 2021). Labuschagne (2017) describe state capture as a state being captured by external third parties manipulating primary government functions at the expense of social welfare. A study conducted by Global Financial Integrity (GFI) assigns the composition of IFFs to three main contributors, with corruption contributing 5%, the proceeds of commercial tax avoidance at 65% and criminal activities at 30% (Mustafa et al, 2019).…”
Section: Illegal Financial Flows and Mis-invoicing In South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the point of twenty years of the democratic experiment, it was already unambiguously evident that the promise of "a better life for all" was a pipe dream (see Tsheola & Sebola, 2012;Tsheola, 2013Tsheola, , 2017Tsheola & Lukhele, 2014;Tsheola, Ramonyai & Segage, 2014;Chipkin, 2016;Dhamija, 2020;. Since then, the ANC government has virtually subjected South Africans to a dizzying rollercoaster of basic services deficiencies, poverty, inequality, unemployment, corruption, state capture and dysfunctional state institutions, violence and defective governance (see Chipkin 2016;Fazekas & Tóth, 2016;Labuschagne, 2017;Mamabolo & Tsheola, 2017;Tsheola & Mmotlana, 2018;de Klerk & Solomon, 2019;Tsheola & Molefe, 2019;Dhamija, 2020;. To this extent, this paper seeks to frame a theoretical argument that suggests that the locus of the reasons for a democratic South Africa being in its current state of despair, facing a realistic disaster, has to be established in the academic and political arenas, wherein fixation on scientific dogma, conceptual binaries and governance utopianisms has scorched lived experiences of all South Africans.…”
Section: Unitary Realities Oneness Of Science and Humanity's Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section has described "lived experiences" of the majority of South Africans, far removed from that envisaged in the principles undergirded by the Constitution as well as the Bill of Rights. It has long been established that achieving "a better life for all" in a democratic South Africa would not be automatic, it would require deliberate appropriate action on the part of the state to create enabling environments (Tsheola, 2002a(Tsheola, , 2002b(Tsheola, , 2012b(Tsheola, , 2013(Tsheola, , 2017Fazekas & Tóth, 2016;Labuschagne, 2017;Mamabolo & Tsheola, 2017;Tsheola & Lukhele, 2014;Tsheola & Makhudu, 2017;Tsheola, Ramoroka & Sebola, 2017;de Klerk & Solomon, 2019;Dhamaji, 2020;. As of 2022, this paper concedes that the South African state has not created an enabling environment within which citizens could make use of productive opportunities to secure better and improved lived experiences.…”
Section: Statistical Portrait Of Scorched-earth South Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…102 In the case of a captured state, elected officials who are part of the systemic state capture network retain the control of resource allocation and a monopoly on political power. 103 This approach suggests that if officials have less access to resources it will lead to fewer opportunities to act corruptly. 104 Putting constraints on government officials practically involve imposing laws that condemn corrupt acts combined with effective law enforcement, an anticorruption commission (or in SA, a state capture commission) that reports to government and an independent judiciary.…”
Section: Policies and Lessons From Other Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%