2015
DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v63i3.15408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patrones de distribución de felinos silvestres (Carnivora: Felidae) en el trópico seco del Centro-Occidente de México

Abstract: Distribution patterns of wild felids (Carnivora: Felidae) in the dry tropics of Central-Western Mexico. The Michoacán state is characterized by the existence of important environmental heterogeneity in terms of climate, topography and types of vegetation, which includes the worldwide endangered tropical dry forest. Some reports indicating the presence of the six species of felids occurring in Mexico in this region have been made; however, evidence to support these reports is scant, and filling this lack of inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Only four of the studies implemented surveys specifically designed to estimate margay density: three from a tropical rainforest site in Oaxaca, Mexico [25][26][27] and one from six sites in the Atlantic forest of southern Brazil [12]. Seven of the studies, across 13 sites, addressed ecological questions other than margay population status: geographic distribution [28]; occupancy [29]; habitat selection [30], felid coexistence [31]; activity patterns and/or relative abundance [14,32,33]; while 11 report on margay detections from camera trap surveys for which margays were not the target species [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. For some large-scale camera surveys, the margays remain conspicuously undetected despite sampling in optimal habitat [31,[45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four of the studies implemented surveys specifically designed to estimate margay density: three from a tropical rainforest site in Oaxaca, Mexico [25][26][27] and one from six sites in the Atlantic forest of southern Brazil [12]. Seven of the studies, across 13 sites, addressed ecological questions other than margay population status: geographic distribution [28]; occupancy [29]; habitat selection [30], felid coexistence [31]; activity patterns and/or relative abundance [14,32,33]; while 11 report on margay detections from camera trap surveys for which margays were not the target species [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. For some large-scale camera surveys, the margays remain conspicuously undetected despite sampling in optimal habitat [31,[45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las 10 especies de mamíferos medianos registrados son de hábitos generalistas, oportunistas y sinantrópicos (Valdez y Ortega, 2014;Charre-Medellín et al, 2015). Destaca por ser la especie silvestre de mayor tamaño en el ANP el coyote C. latrans, el mesodepredador con mayor éxito en México, de amplia distribución, que cumple la función de regular las poblaciones de roedores y lagomorfos que, de manera frecuente, entran en conflicto con las comunidades humanas al consumir animales de granja (Guerrero et al, 2002;Hernández et al, 2002;Hidalgo-Mihart et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En nuestra búsqueda de registros de presecia de margay, encontramos el mayor número en San Luis Potosí y Oaxaca porque fue en estos estados de la República Mexicana donde se desarrollaron la mayoría de los trabajos de investigación que publicaron registros georreferenciados de margay en años recientes (Botello et al, 2006(Botello et al, , 2008Cinta-Magallón et al, 2012;Lira-Torres et al, 2005Martínez-Calderas et al, 2012Pérez-Irineo y Santos-Moreno, 2012). En contraste, las investigaciones realizadas en el suroeste del Estado de México, el sur de Michoacán y el sureste de Tamaulipas verificaron la presencia del margay por medio de fotocapturas y capturas de ejemplares, pero no publicaron las coordenadas geográficas de los sitios de colecta (Carvajal-Villareal et al, 2012;Charre-Medellín et al, 2015;Monroy-Vilchis et al, 2011). En la península de Yucatán los registros fueron muy escasos y no obtuvimos ningún registro en Tabasco (Faller-Menéndez et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified