Pattern and risk factors of sharp object injuries among health care workers in two tertiary hospitals, Al Taif-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2016–2018

Abstract

Occupational exposure of healthcare workers to blood and body fluids following skin injury constitutes a risk for transmission of blood-borne pathogens. The risk of exposure is greater as well. The present study aimed to determine the burden and risk factors of sharp object injuries in two tertiary hospitals in the Taif City KSA. Retrospective review of needle stick injury records was included from the two hospital's staff clinics. A Total of 131 health professionals (employees) recorded as exposed to sharp object injuries from both hospitals were enrolled during period 2016–2018. The collected data was cleaned, reviewed and analyzed using Statistical Package of Social Sciences SPSS ver. 25. The result of the study revealed that, the mean age for the 131 enrolled participants was 31 ± 6.6, Male to Female Ratio was 1:3. The most affected age group was 20–30 years (55.7%). Females were more affected 98 out of 131 (74.8%) than male (33out of 131 (25.2%). And there is increasing incidence rates of exposure from 2.89 /10.000 patient/day in 2016 to 3.42/ 10.000 patients'/day in 2017, with highest exposed nationalities; Filipino 42 (32.1%), Saudi 31 (23.7%), and Indians 26 (19.8%), the remaining 24.5% were from 10 mixed nationalities. The frequent affected divisions were: ER, surgical ward, operation room, ICU, laboratory, Medical W, Medical waste facilities (19.8%, 15%, 12.2%, 9.2%, 92% respectively). The most affected HCWs categories were nurses 74(56.5%), doctor 23(17.6%) and housekeeping 18 (13.7%). And the needle prick 104(79.4%) and cut wound 15(11.5%) constitute the highest type of injuries and were during operation 23 (17.6%), waste collection 15 (11.5%), cannulation 12 (9.2%) and giving injection 12 (9.2%). The common devices caused injuries were bore hole needle 63(48.1%), suture needle **(13.7%), cannula and insulin syringe 13 (9.9%) each. This study concluded that, as from 2016−2018, there was an increasing rate of reported accidental exposure to sharp needle injuries amongst HCWs from 3.0 to 3.4/10.000 patient/day, and the younger and nurses were mostly impacted. Workplace, distress, work types and load had influences on injuries rates and types. Fortunately, no exposure among employee with HBV, HCV and HIV seroconversion were documented.

Factors Influencing Turnover Intention among Nurses and Midwives in Ghana

“…The exposure of nurses and midwives to cuts, wounds, needle pricks, and injuries from sharps is not surprising due to their frequent use of sharp objects, such as needles, for injections and other sharp objects at the workplace [ 25 ]. This finding is comparable to a study in Saudi Arabia that reported that among healthcare workers, nurses (56.5%) were the most affected by sharp object injuries at the workplace [ 26 ]. A higher prevalence of needle stick injuries has also been reported among Iranian nurses in the workplace [ 27 ].…”

Factors Associated with Percutaneous Injuries & Needle Stick Injuries among Health Care Workers in Nyangabwe Referral Hospital Francistown, Botswana

“…A study conducted in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital indicated that health care workers working in the maternity unit were 99.1% less likely to sustain needle stick injuries than those working in the laboratory unit [12]. Another study conducted by [13] indicated that the medical department/medicine department recorded a high incidence of injuries with 51.9 %.…”

Trend of Work-related Injuries in the Philippines from 2010-2020

“…8 Cut wounds (17.6%) and needle prick (79.4%) are the most common type of injuries. 12 Factors found to influence contact to sharp objects are the workplace environment, distress, work types and load. 8 In the same study, Filipinos (32.1%) had the highest exposure to sharp objects, followed by Saudi (23.7%) and Indians (19.8%) in Taif City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.…”