2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0231-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern Cue and Visual Cue Competition in a Foraging Task by Rats

Abstract: In 4 experiments, rats searched for food located on top of 4 of 16 towers which were arranged in a 4 × 4 matrix. The location of the baited towers was cued by visual landmark cues (the baited towers were striped, the others white) and by pattern cues (the baited towers were located in a 2 × 2 pattern within the larger 4 × 4 matrix) or simply by pattern cues without visual landmark cues. In 3 of the experiments, visual cues, after being paired with pattern cues, were removed altogether (Experiment 1), put into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will also not suffice to test for continuous cues separately because animals may learn multiple redundant cues and use those available when others are not [74][75][76][77][78][79]. Testing all continuous variables (that cannot be kept constant across stimuli for the entirety of training) and numerosity within one test can help determine if continuous variables have been learned.…”
Section: Discussion (A) General Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will also not suffice to test for continuous cues separately because animals may learn multiple redundant cues and use those available when others are not [74][75][76][77][78][79]. Testing all continuous variables (that cannot be kept constant across stimuli for the entirety of training) and numerosity within one test can help determine if continuous variables have been learned.…”
Section: Discussion (A) General Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shape-parameter theories [14] share with mapped-landmark theories the assumption that the map encodes nongeometric features of the environment, as well as its geometry. Like mappedlandmark theories, they assume that the animal uses those features as both signs and beacons under ordinary navigational circumstances, when it is oriented (compare [15]). When, however, the animal is disoriented, the re-alignment of its current perception of environmental shape with the remembered environmental shape is mediated by a computation that relies on parameters computationally abstracted from global shape, such as principal axes or medial axes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%