2020
DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20201189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of adverse drug reactions reported at a tertiary care teaching hospital in northern India

Abstract: Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are among the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital setup. This study was conducted with the aim of understanding the pattern and occurrence of ADRs to minimize their risk and safeguard public health.Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of pattern of ADRs reported at ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 207 spontaneous ADR reports collected over a period of 18 months were analysed for pattern and type of reaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was similar to findings of numerous previous studies. 12,[16][17][18][19] The reason could be that antimicrobials are the most common class of drugs to be used in hospital settings. So, the chances of ADRs being reported due to them are also high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was similar to findings of numerous previous studies. 12,[16][17][18][19] The reason could be that antimicrobials are the most common class of drugs to be used in hospital settings. So, the chances of ADRs being reported due to them are also high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result was in concordance with some previous studies. 18,19 The reason for being most of the ADRs under probable or possible causality assessment was due to lack of information provided by patients on causality assessment by Naranjo scale. And also due to many ethical issues rechallenging was hardly done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%