Pattern of Congenital Anomalies in A Tertiary Care Centre

Vinodh, Dr S. Lakshmi

doi:10.18535/jmscr/v5i1.94

Cited by 5 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6 The male babies were most commonly affected than Female babies, it may be because of the fact that the females were afflicted with more lethal congenital malformations and could not survive to be born with signs of life. The results of our study findings were similar to the study findings of Tapan Pattanaik et al, Bhalerao and Garg, Doddabasappa et al 7,5,8 The age of the mother during pregnancy associated with congenital anomalies in our study showed lea than 25 years were more commonly affected, similar results were also seen in the study done by Tapan Pattanaik et al, and S. Lakshmi Vinodh et al 7,9 The Multigravida Mothers were commonly affected by Congenital anomalies in our study which is comparable to the study findings of Tapan Pattanaik et al, and Bhalerao and Garg. 5,7 In the present study, congenital anomalies were observed in 18.6% of consanguineous marriage and 81.4% of nonconsanguineous marriage, similar results were also seen in the study done by Tapan Pattanaik et al, and Bhalerao and Garg.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…5,7 In the present study, most of the mothers of babies were registered (95.3%) followed by Unregistered (4.7%) which is in contrast to the study findings of Sandya rani et al, where it was seen almost equally in both the groups. 11 The findings of the weight of babies associated with congenital anomalies in our study were similar to the study findings of S Lakshmi Vinodh et al, and Alawad AM et al 6,9 The findings of our study was comparable to the S Lakshmi Vinodh et al Findings where singleton had more incidences of Congenital Anamolies. 9 The involvement of Various systems was seen in our study.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…11 The findings of the weight of babies associated with congenital anomalies in our study were similar to the study findings of S Lakshmi Vinodh et al, and Alawad AM et al 6,9 The findings of our study was comparable to the S Lakshmi Vinodh et al Findings where singleton had more incidences of Congenital Anamolies. 9 The involvement of Various systems was seen in our study. Similarly, S. Lakshmi Vinod et al and Kokate P et al also observed congenital anomalies in most of the systems.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Similarly, S. Lakshmi Vinod et al and Kokate P et al also observed congenital anomalies in most of the systems. 9,10 In authors studies babies born to diabetic and nondiabetic mother the difference is statistically not significant as P value is 0.0779. This finding is in agreement with the study conducted by Kokate P et al, congenital anomalies were observed in 6 % of babies with congenital anomalies were born to diabetic mothers.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A cross sectional study to find incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations and factors affecting it in tertiary care hospital

Yaragatti

Shivanagouda

2019

Int J Contemp Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Congenital malformations are emerging as an important perinatal problem, contributing sizably to the perinatal mortality with considerable repercussions on the mothers and the families. Patients with multiple congenital anomalies present a relatively infrequent but tremendously difficult challenge to the pediatrician. Authors objective was to study the incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations among consecutive births in hospital deliveries examined during hospital stay.Methods: A prospective cross sectional study was conducted in Department of Pediatrics at Dr R N Cooper Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai from June 2016 to June 2017. All live births from June 2016 to June 2017 were considered in the studyResults: The total number of deliveries in our hospital were 3120(100%) and the total number of babies with congenital anomaly were 43(1.4%), So the incidence of congenital anomalies amongst study population was 1.4%. The involvement of various systems was seen in our study. The involvement of CNS (9.3%), Eye (7%), ENT (28%), GIT (20.9%), Urinary Tract (2.3%), Musculoskeletal System (35%), Gentialia (7%), CVS (7%).Conclusions: Congenital malformation, one of the important causes of infant mortality and morbidity can be reduced by proper preconception care and level two anomaly scan. Congenital anomalies must be identified, as early diagnosis and surgical correction of malformed babies offer the best chance for survival.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A cross sectional study to find incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations and factors affecting it in tertiary care hospital

Yaragatti

Shivanagouda

2019

Int J Contemp Pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These findings are comparable to similar studies from India, which reported an incidence of 2.72% and 1.9%, 2.48%. [8][9][10] The most common anomaly detected was Central nervous system malformations, 40/75 (53.33%). Many studies have shown that CNS malformations were associated with high perinatal mortality.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of pattern of congenital anomalies at tertiary center in Maharashtra, India

Yadav

Damase

2018

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To highlight common pattern of congenital malformation seen at hospital population of tertiary care center in Maharashtra.Methods: The study was a descriptive prospective study and conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology of government medical college Latur, Maharashtra for a period of six months. Study includes all womens coming for 2nd trimester MTP due to congenital anomalies in foetus and women’s admitted in labour having anomalous foetus. Details of maternal age, parity, type of anomaly present and sex of fetus were noted.Results: Total babies born in the study period were 3482 (including the second trimester abortions). Total babies with congenital abnormality were 75, making the prevalence 2.15%. 10 cases (13.33) had multiple anomalies involving more than one system. The predominant system involved was central nervous system 40 (53.33%) followed by gastrointestinal system 15 (20%). In this study male babies affected more than females.Conclusions: Prevalence of the congenital anomalies will be definitely higher at tertiary care center and to know prevalence in community, more community based studies are required. Increased awareness about preventable risk factors may help in reducing the incidence of congenital anomalies.

show abstract

Sources of bias in studies reporting birth prevalence of congenital anomalies: a scoping review and reporting checklist

Dharmarajan,

Bhide,

Kar

2024

Journal of Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Data on the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries report wide variations in prevalence estimates. We conducted a scoping review to identify the sources of bias in studies reporting birth prevalence of congenital anomalies in World Health Organization South-East Asia region (SEAR) countries. Methods PubMed and Google Scholar databases were screened for relevant literature. Data on study characteristics and sources of bias was extracted. A narrative synthesis of the data is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A checklist for reporting studies on birth prevalence of congenital anomalies (CD-Checklist) was developed. Results The literature search retrieved 47 articles. Birth prevalence varied from 0.21% to 9.68%. Sampling bias was evident as studies were single hospital studies, lacked relevant description of sample, did not justify sample size or describe the process of sampling. Information bias was identified as studies did not mention classification system used, and failed to clearly distinguish between number of malformations and babies with malformations. Observer and reporting bias were noted. Conclusions Several sources of bias introduce variations in birth prevalence reports of congenital anomalies in SEAR countries. A checklist (CD-Checklist) has been suggested which can guide investigators to minimize the risk of bias in studies.

show abstract

Pattern of Congenital Anomalies in A Tertiary Care Centre

Abstract: Aim of the Study-The aim of this study is to identify the common patterns of anomalies seen in the hospital

Cited by 5 publications

References 5 publications

A cross sectional study to find incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations and factors affecting it in tertiary care hospital

A cross sectional study to find incidence of clinically detectable congenital malformations and factors affecting it in tertiary care hospital

Study of pattern of congenital anomalies at tertiary center in Maharashtra, India

Sources of bias in studies reporting birth prevalence of congenital anomalies: a scoping review and reporting checklist

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About