1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92483-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Development and Loss of Bone With Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone mass was determined by means of a wrist and hand, including distal phalanges, x-ray and using the Exton-Smith Index [8,9]. This measure (D2-d2/D2 x 1000, D = external diameter, d = internal diameter of the 2nd left metacarpal bone, L = bone length) was chosen, al though it is a relatively old method, because it had been used before for the Greek population and was easily trans portable for use in the village.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone mass was determined by means of a wrist and hand, including distal phalanges, x-ray and using the Exton-Smith Index [8,9]. This measure (D2-d2/D2 x 1000, D = external diameter, d = internal diameter of the 2nd left metacarpal bone, L = bone length) was chosen, al though it is a relatively old method, because it had been used before for the Greek population and was easily trans portable for use in the village.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone resorption is a well-documented component of human aging (e.g., Garnet al 1967;Exton-Smith et al 1969) and is likewise observed in rodents (McDonald et al 1986). Further, in a study utilizing sample sizes of ten urban females, ten urban males, ten rural females and ten rural males for each age decade from 20 to >70, concentrations of Pb in certain bones (midfemur and pelvis) were reported by Drasch et al (1987) to reach a plateau in middle-age then to decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) were measured using needle calipers (British Indi cators, Ltd.). To make a valid comparison between the bones of different hands, variations in skeletal size need to be taken into account, which is done by dividing the cross-sectional area (D2-d 2) by the surface area, thus giving a dimensionless ra tio of cortical area to surface area [Exton-Smith et al, 1969b], The difference be tween the ratio of the normal hand and that of the hemiplegic hand is easily calcu lated and thus the degree of bone loss estimated. Grip strength of the hemiplegic hand was graded using a simple scoring method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%