1983
DOI: 10.1177/096032718300200109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern of Uptake of Americium-241 by the Rat Skeleton and its Subsequent Redistribution and Retention: Implications for Human Dosimetry and Toxicology

Abstract: The distribution and retention of intravenously injected 241Am in the skeleton of the female rat has been investigated using autoradiographic and radiochemical techniques. The studies were designed to assess the dosimetric and toxicologic implications of an 241Am intake by man. They showed that in the rat approximately one third of the intravenously injected 241Am was deposited in the skeleton where it appeared to be retained with a long b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussion ' Pattern of uptake The results of the present experiments show that most of the 226 Ra deposited in the rat skeleton is present as a volume deposit and is fairly evenly distributed throughout the bone matrix. This pattern of uptake is very different to that described for other a-emitting bone-seeking radionuclides such as 239pu (Green et al, 1978;Jee, 1972;Priest & Giannola, (1980),241Am (Polig, 1978;Priest et al, 1982b) and 233U (Stevens et al, 1980;Priest et al, 1982a) which deposit almost exclusively on bone surfaces. The attachment of 226 Ra to the bone matrix must in part be reversible as in excess of 20 % of the bone radium is lost to excretion within the first four days after its injection.…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Discussion ' Pattern of uptake The results of the present experiments show that most of the 226 Ra deposited in the rat skeleton is present as a volume deposit and is fairly evenly distributed throughout the bone matrix. This pattern of uptake is very different to that described for other a-emitting bone-seeking radionuclides such as 239pu (Green et al, 1978;Jee, 1972;Priest & Giannola, (1980),241Am (Polig, 1978;Priest et al, 1982b) and 233U (Stevens et al, 1980;Priest et al, 1982a) which deposit almost exclusively on bone surfaces. The attachment of 226 Ra to the bone matrix must in part be reversible as in excess of 20 % of the bone radium is lost to excretion within the first four days after its injection.…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Results of early autoradiographic studies on rodents (Hamilton, 1948) indicated that the sites of deposition on bone surfaces are similar for americium, curium, and actinium, but that the surface distribution of these elements differed from that of plutonium. Later studies involving refined techniques and various animal species yielded relatively detailed descriptions of the distribution of some actinide elements, particularly plutonium and americium, on bone surfaces (Herring et al., 1962; Lloyd et al., 1972a; Durbin, 1973; Priest et al., 1983). Plutonium deposits mainly on endosteal surfaces, especially the surfaces of the trabeculae of spongy bone near the sinusoidal circulation of active marrow (Durbin, 2011).…”
Section: A Generic Biokinetic Modelling Scheme For the Actinidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term studies on dogs (Lloyd et al., 1970; Mewhinney et al., 1982) indicate that a large portion of the initial liver burden gradually transfers to the skeleton. (950) Hamilton (1948) described the sites of bone deposition of americium and curium in rodents as indistinguishable from those of the trivalent elements cerium, promethium, and actinium, but different from sites of deposition of the tetravalent elements plutonium, thorium, and zirconium. Later studies involving a variety of animal species indicate that americium deposits on all types of bone surfaces, including resorbing and forming surfaces (Herring, 1962; Lloyd et al., 1972a; Durbin, 1973; Priest et al., 1983). Deposition on bone surfaces is more uniform than that of plutonium, although there are gradations in the intensity of the americium label.…”
Section: Americium (Z = 95)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Days after injection 1982, Crawley et al 1976, Priest et al . 1983) with the lowest levels in the tail and paws and highest levels in the ribs and the pelvis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%