2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010701)44:3<195::aid-cyto1112>3.0.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pattern recognition in flow cytometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they require statistical clustering or artificial neural networks to construct functional groups (Boddy et al, 2001), and these final categories may not have a general ecological interpretation. Each different method suffers from arbitrary decision steps that may critically affect the outcomes in terms of BD metrics, through identity and abundance of resulting formed groups (Figure 2) (Petchey and Gaston, 2006).…”
Section: Application Of Automated Sfc In the Field: Current Use And Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they require statistical clustering or artificial neural networks to construct functional groups (Boddy et al, 2001), and these final categories may not have a general ecological interpretation. Each different method suffers from arbitrary decision steps that may critically affect the outcomes in terms of BD metrics, through identity and abundance of resulting formed groups (Figure 2) (Petchey and Gaston, 2006).…”
Section: Application Of Automated Sfc In the Field: Current Use And Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, visualizing these data becomes more and more complex and requires multiple sequential analyses to provide information about each cell subset. Therefore, automated classification systems are being developed (109)(110)(111)(112). Additionally, optimization of storage conditions to preserve CSF cells should result in higher cell yields and thereby increase the detection rate of flow cytometry in CSF samples with low cellularity.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output layer was structured to have two outputs that could each vary between 0 and 1. Output vectors for the training and validation set were defined to be [1,0] for the first dye and [0,1] for the second dye. The training algorithms used were a resilient back-propagation (TrainRP), a scaled conjugate gradient algorithm (TrainSCG), and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (TrainLM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%