2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterning at the micro/nano-scale: Polymeric scaffolds for medical diagnostic and cell-surface interaction applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 285 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that cells usually encounter fibrous, continuous structures when migrating in vivo , so exploring cell migration on continuous fibrous structures makes more sense [ 20 ]. To manufacture such microscale and nanoscale continuous structures, traditional methods, such as photolithography and molding are complex, expensive, and challenging to change dimensionally [ 21 , 22 ]. Electrowriting, which precisely controls fiber deposition through electrostatic force, can fabricate fibers within the desired size range while avoiding the previously mentioned drawbacks [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that cells usually encounter fibrous, continuous structures when migrating in vivo , so exploring cell migration on continuous fibrous structures makes more sense [ 20 ]. To manufacture such microscale and nanoscale continuous structures, traditional methods, such as photolithography and molding are complex, expensive, and challenging to change dimensionally [ 21 , 22 ]. Electrowriting, which precisely controls fiber deposition through electrostatic force, can fabricate fibers within the desired size range while avoiding the previously mentioned drawbacks [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in nanoscience continuously propel such a drive to create flexible and miniaturized biosensors, permitting high-throughput detection of bioanalytes that are held on an array of nanometer-sized sensor surfaces in a flexible setting. The majority of conventional biosensors are fabricated by top-down approaches such as photolithography, soft (microcontact printing) lithography, and inkjet printing, which can be costly and time-consuming [2,13,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Fabrication techniques relying on conventional lithographic procedures also present limitations in the size of the smallest possible sensor unit that can be individually addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there exist lithographic tools of higher spatial resolution such as electron-beam lithography [26][27][28], scanning probebased lithography [29,30] and nanoimprint lithography [31,32], the involvement of these procedures can lead to an even slower fabrication process and a higher production cost. Hence, alternative approaches based on self-assembly have emerged to create nanoscopic patterns of individually addressable biosensor surfaces and nanoscale bioreactors in simple steps [17,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcontact printing techniques (μCPs) using PDMS stamps have been applied in many research fields, such as biopatterning, (opto)­electronics, , sensors, materials science, , microfluidics, and others. Low cost and feasibility of the technique have been the reasons for the vast applications of different variations of μCP for decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%