2016
DOI: 10.1557/mrs.2016.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterning via self-organization and self-folding: Beyond conventional lithography

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different fabrication techniques have been developed to form various 3D structures, including 3D printing, two photon/multiphoton lithography, and self‐assembly . However, these methods cannot produce inorganic semiconductors such as silicon . Alternatively, mechanically driven assemblies such as strain‐induced bending or folding and compressive buckling have the potential to extend the range of materials, including silicon .…”
Section: Comparison Between Kirigami Structures In Terms Of Response mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different fabrication techniques have been developed to form various 3D structures, including 3D printing, two photon/multiphoton lithography, and self‐assembly . However, these methods cannot produce inorganic semiconductors such as silicon . Alternatively, mechanically driven assemblies such as strain‐induced bending or folding and compressive buckling have the potential to extend the range of materials, including silicon .…”
Section: Comparison Between Kirigami Structures In Terms Of Response mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a ). The first two steps are fully compatible with conventional photolithographic processes, where established microfabrication tools such as photopatterning, physical and chemical vapor depositions, wet and dry etching can be employed 42 , 43 . Due to the parallel nature of the microfabrication techniques and the self-folding process, large-area arrays with many identical pixels can be obtained in the same fabrication batch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although nanostructures can be designed by top-down approaches (e.g., [2][3][4]), its high cost and size limitations (∼100 nm) have made the low-cost bottom-up approaches involving selforganization processes attractive. This approach is still investigated, as confirmed by the numerous recent papers and the recent issue of MRS Bulletin dedicated to the fabrication of ordered patterns and nanostructures via self-organization [5]. However, the realization of oxide nanostructures is still much less advanced than metal and semiconductor nanostructures, certainly because of the structural and chemical complexity of functional oxides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%