2016
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns and drivers of zoogeographical regions of terrestrial vertebrates in China

Abstract: Aim Zoogeographical regionalizations have recently seen a revived interest, which has provided new insights into biogeographical patterns. However, few quantitative studies have focused on zoogeographical regions of China. Here, we analyse zoogeographical regions for terrestrial vertebrates in China and how these regions relate to environmental and geological drivers and evaluate levels of cross‐taxon congruence. Location China. Methods We applied hierarchical clustering and non‐metric multidimensional scaling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, 12 birds and five mammals originated from the Eastern Himalayas, whereas a majority of ectotherms colonized from the nearby regions such as South China and Japan. This incongruence among lineages is consistent with previous studies that focused on the pairwise similarities of species composition (He et al., ; Holt et al., ). It has been reported that different lineages showed varied biogeographical patterns in response to the geological and climatic history (Wang et al., ), which is partly due to different dispersal capabilities and thermal tolerances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, 12 birds and five mammals originated from the Eastern Himalayas, whereas a majority of ectotherms colonized from the nearby regions such as South China and Japan. This incongruence among lineages is consistent with previous studies that focused on the pairwise similarities of species composition (He et al., ; Holt et al., ). It has been reported that different lineages showed varied biogeographical patterns in response to the geological and climatic history (Wang et al., ), which is partly due to different dispersal capabilities and thermal tolerances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We compared models with two parameters (d: dispersal and e: extinction) against models with three parameters (d, e, and j: founder‐event speciation) and used Akaike's information criterion (AIC) to select the best biogeographical model (Matzke, ). The geographical distributions of species were coded as presence/absence in 12 biogeographical regions (He, Kreft, Gao, Wang, & Jiang, ; Kreft & Jetz, ), namely, Taiwan (TW), South China (SC), North China & Korea (NCK), Japan (JP), the Eastern Himalayas (EH), the Malay Archipelago (ML), Indochina (INC), India & Sri Lanka (INL), Australian (AU), Americas (AM), Africa (AF) and the Palaearctic (PA) (Supporting Information Appendix S2: Figure S2.1). To confirm our findings, we repeated the ancestral range estimates using four independent time trees.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple drivers have shaped the biogeographical regions of the world 2 . Generally, sharp changes in climatic conditions determine extant biogeographical boundaries 2 – 4 . Limited divergences occur in areas with abrupt climatic transitions 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioregionalization exercises based on species occurrence data often rely on species turnover and distance-based clustering methods (e.g. González-Orozco, Laffan, Knerr, & Miller, 2013;He, Kreft, Gao, Wang, & Jiang, 2017;Kreft & Jetz, 2010). Recently, a network-based method based on a community-detection algorithm known as Infomap has been put forward for identifying bioregions (Vilhena & Antonelli, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%