2014
DOI: 10.1080/10496505.2014.958933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns and Impact of Public Expenditure on Agriculture: Empirical Evidence from Benue State, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative coefficient of 1.20 shows that one percent increase in expenditure on agriculture and allied activities leads to over 1.2 percent decrease in agriculture output and this is in line with the study by [10][11][12] and contradicts the study by [6][7][8]. The negative relationship is due to the fact that public expenditure through agriculture and allied activities comprise of other expenditure like Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development, Fisheries, Forestry and Wild Life (in addition to expenditure through Crop Husbandry, Soil and Water Conservation, Agricultural Research and Education) which do not contribute to the increase of agricultural GSDP directly.…”
Section: International Journal Of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resourcessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative coefficient of 1.20 shows that one percent increase in expenditure on agriculture and allied activities leads to over 1.2 percent decrease in agriculture output and this is in line with the study by [10][11][12] and contradicts the study by [6][7][8]. The negative relationship is due to the fact that public expenditure through agriculture and allied activities comprise of other expenditure like Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development, Fisheries, Forestry and Wild Life (in addition to expenditure through Crop Husbandry, Soil and Water Conservation, Agricultural Research and Education) which do not contribute to the increase of agricultural GSDP directly.…”
Section: International Journal Of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resourcessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A number of studies reveal that there is a positive relationship between public expenditure and agriculture output [6][7][8]. On the other hand, some studies show a negative relationship between public expenditure and agriculture output [9][10][11][12]. Public investment in R & D is observed to be a superior performer in enhancing agricultural results and decreasing poverty or destitution.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Government expenditure on agriculture contrast dramatically with the sectors importance in the Nigerian economy and the policy emphasis on diversifying away from oil (Okezie, Nwosu, & Njoku, 2013). Budgetary allocation to agriculture in Nigeria remains below the 10% suggested by the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) (Ani, Biam, & Kantiok., 2015;). According to Olomola, Tewodaji, Olofinbiyi, Nwoke, et al, (2014), spending on agriculture as a share of total federal spending averaged 4.6% between 2008 and 2012 has been trending downward precipitously.…”
Section: Human Capacity Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is clear evidence that FDI crowd-in government spending into agriculture without comparing agriculture production coming from the simultaneous change of both foreign direct investment and domestic capital flow as intended by this study. Alabi and Abu (2020) in a Nigeria based study analysed the impact of agricultural public expenditure on agricultural productivity in Nigeria between 1981 and 2014. The study used the Error Correction Model (ECM) on a key dataset comprising of agricultural productivity, agricultural public expenditure (capital and recurrent), investment, and labour to carry out its empirical analysis.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%