2018
DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States

Abstract: IntroductionWe examined the prevalence of cancer screening reported in 2015 among US adults, adjusted for important sociodemographic and access-to-care variables. By using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for 2000 through 2015, we examined trends in prevalence of cancer screening that adhered to US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendations in order to monitor screening progress among traditionally underserved population subgroups.MethodsWe analyzed NHIS data from surveys fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
182
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
12
182
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both surveys provide nationally representative samples for examining the prevalence and temporal trends of mammography use, identifying risk factors associated with mammography use, and investigating disparities in use among population subgroups. [4][5][6][7] Four common domains of factors shared by NHIS and BRFSS are: sociodemographics, health status, health-care access and utilization, and health behaviors. 6 Overlap of available variables from both surveys provides a great opportunity to conduct a side-by-side comparison between NHIS and BRFSS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both surveys provide nationally representative samples for examining the prevalence and temporal trends of mammography use, identifying risk factors associated with mammography use, and investigating disparities in use among population subgroups. [4][5][6][7] Four common domains of factors shared by NHIS and BRFSS are: sociodemographics, health status, health-care access and utilization, and health behaviors. 6 Overlap of available variables from both surveys provides a great opportunity to conduct a side-by-side comparison between NHIS and BRFSS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large nationwide sample of family caregivers of cancer survivors, we examined how caregivers' fear of their survivor's cancer recurring was related to their cancer screening behaviors. Caregivers' screening behaviors were higher than those of the US population for colorectal (69% for caregivers vs 59% for the general population), breast (85% for caregivers vs 72% for the general population), and prostate (72% for caregivers vs 36% for the general population) cancers . However, approximately 5% of these screenings were completed prematurely according to clinical guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Caregivers' screening behaviors were higher than those of the US population for colorectal (69% for caregivers vs 59% for the general population), breast (85% for caregivers vs 72% for the general population), and prostate (72% for caregivers vs 36% for the general population) cancers. 35,36 However, approximately 5% of these screenings were completed prematurely according to clinical guidelines. Furthermore, fewer caregivers maintained cancer screening at recommended intervals, particularly for breast or prostate cancer screening (we were unable to adequately evaluate whether those statistics from caregivers are comparable to those of the US population with regard to cancer screening maintenance behaviors).…”
Section: Cancer Screening Behaviors Of Cancer Caregiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] The low uptake of screening observed in our study are similar to findings from other studies reporting lower screening proportions among refugees and immigrants when compared to U. S. born populations. [19][20][21]36] Acceptance of screening was highest among the Myanmar and Bhutanese groups. The Building Bridges program was most effective in these two culture groups.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%