Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Bony fishes play a pivotal role in Ecuador's social, economic, and ecological aspects. However, the current state of scientific knowledge on this group remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the scientific output related to Ecuadorian bony fishes, identifying both well‐researched and understudied areas. A scientometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, evaluating 265 peer‐reviewed publications on marine and freshwater bony fishes. The results revealed that 55.5% of studies focused on marine environments, 41.9% on freshwater ecosystems, and 2.6% on mixed environments. The earliest study was published more than 130 years ago, with a marked increase in research output since 2018. Geographic and regional disparities in research efforts were evident, with the Galapagos Islands hosting the highest number of studies at the provincial level and the coastal region leading in regional publications. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in the participation of women in research over time; however, it remains significantly below parity. English was the dominant language in these publications. On average, the delay between data collection and publication was 8.43 years, which may lead to outdated or ineffective management decisions. This underscores the importance of continually updating data to ensure the accuracy of conservation status assessments. Both marine and freshwater species that were endemic have been less studied compared to non‐endemic species. Most of the studied species were categorized as “least concern,” although a significant proportion of species classified as “data deficient” have started to be investigated by Ecuadorian researchers. The categories “endangered” and “near threatened” were the least studied, highlighting the urgent need for conservation initiatives targeting these vulnerable taxa. Biases in the number of studies among families, species, and geographic distribution indicate the need to expand research efforts to underrepresented taxa and regions. This analysis underscores the necessity of diversifying methodologies and broadening the research focus to more comprehensively address the challenges associated with the conservation and management of bony fishes in Ecuador.
Bony fishes play a pivotal role in Ecuador's social, economic, and ecological aspects. However, the current state of scientific knowledge on this group remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the scientific output related to Ecuadorian bony fishes, identifying both well‐researched and understudied areas. A scientometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, evaluating 265 peer‐reviewed publications on marine and freshwater bony fishes. The results revealed that 55.5% of studies focused on marine environments, 41.9% on freshwater ecosystems, and 2.6% on mixed environments. The earliest study was published more than 130 years ago, with a marked increase in research output since 2018. Geographic and regional disparities in research efforts were evident, with the Galapagos Islands hosting the highest number of studies at the provincial level and the coastal region leading in regional publications. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in the participation of women in research over time; however, it remains significantly below parity. English was the dominant language in these publications. On average, the delay between data collection and publication was 8.43 years, which may lead to outdated or ineffective management decisions. This underscores the importance of continually updating data to ensure the accuracy of conservation status assessments. Both marine and freshwater species that were endemic have been less studied compared to non‐endemic species. Most of the studied species were categorized as “least concern,” although a significant proportion of species classified as “data deficient” have started to be investigated by Ecuadorian researchers. The categories “endangered” and “near threatened” were the least studied, highlighting the urgent need for conservation initiatives targeting these vulnerable taxa. Biases in the number of studies among families, species, and geographic distribution indicate the need to expand research efforts to underrepresented taxa and regions. This analysis underscores the necessity of diversifying methodologies and broadening the research focus to more comprehensively address the challenges associated with the conservation and management of bony fishes in Ecuador.
The absence of historical data on endangered species poses a conservation and socio-environmental problem. It is currently estimated that about one-third of all Chondrichthyes are under some level of threat, with knowledge gaps for many species. The aim of this research was to carry out a scientometric analysis on the scientific production concerning Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) on Chondrichthyes. Searches on the subject were carried out at the SciELO, Scopus and Web of Science databases. The retrieved publications were assessed and sorted by a list of inclusion criteria, totaling 120 articles. The findings indicate that studies concerning LEK applied to Chondrichthyes assessments have recently gained relevance. The studies were published in a wide variety of journals and by researchers from different countries. Most research was aimed at marine ecosystems, and interviewees were usually professional fishers. From 179 studied Chondrichthyes, most are large sharks with conspicuous diagnostic characters, such as Galeocerdo cuvier, Isurus oxyrinchus and Sphyrna lewini, mainly in publications focused on fisheries. Studies addressing ethnoknowledge as a historical data collection source are undoubtedly paramount, and the need for further investments aiming at research in countries with scarce data addressing other actors, themes and scarcely studied taxa, is clear.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.