2017
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1403564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns in the form of formative feedback and student response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research reveals that feedback can improve students' course grades with gains ranging from one half to one full grade (Hwang and Chang, 2011;Popham, 2011) to some of the largest learning gains reported for educational interventions (Earl, 2013, p.25;Vonderwell and Boboc, 2013). Second, feedback is associated with increased levels of motivation among students (Shute, 2008;Harlen, 2013;Ellegaard et al, 2018;Dawson et al, 2019). Third, feedback has been linked to remedial activities, such as directing future learning and identifying students who require additional support (Tett et al, 2012;Merry et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Feedback and Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research reveals that feedback can improve students' course grades with gains ranging from one half to one full grade (Hwang and Chang, 2011;Popham, 2011) to some of the largest learning gains reported for educational interventions (Earl, 2013, p.25;Vonderwell and Boboc, 2013). Second, feedback is associated with increased levels of motivation among students (Shute, 2008;Harlen, 2013;Ellegaard et al, 2018;Dawson et al, 2019). Third, feedback has been linked to remedial activities, such as directing future learning and identifying students who require additional support (Tett et al, 2012;Merry et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Feedback and Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the task of education institutions to provide feedback and should, therefore, encourage systematic improvement and training in the utilization of feedback (Adalberon 2020). It is also found that although feedback can be in different modes (written or spoken, formal or informal, planned or unplanned, immediate or delayed, direct or indirect, and ad hoc), generally, assessment feedback is categorized into two types in literature: formative and summative (Aoun et al 2016;Colbran et al 2016;Ellegaard et al 2017;Sadler 1989). Formative assessment feedback is given much importance in most studies because it is considered "timely" for application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to enhance and facilitate learning across levels in the education system is through formative assessment (Ellegaard et al 2017). Formative feedback is designed to ensure a school is able to access formative information regarding the learning process to provide a guideline for teachers and students (Halverson 2010).…”
Section: Formative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the rationale behind using structured feedback cover sheets is that it enhances the effectiveness of feedback comments by guiding attention of tutors to the use of feed up, feedback, and feed forward and to the use of explanations of why things are good or bad (adding depth). Structured feedback cover sheets may also be a tool to improve the feedback dialogue, since it may include fields for student responses and questions (see for instance, the structured feedback cover sheet in Ellegaard et al, 2018). Together, all these assumptions may be the reasons for the numerous structured feedback cover sheets that circulate in educational practice.…”
Section: Improving the Quality Of Written Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%