“…This evaluation must consider three types of information: 1) the characteristics of the fracture itself; 2) the skeletal pattern of trauma in the individual and the population; and 3) the social, culture historical, and/or environmental context of the human remains, including the presence of artifacts. Clinical research has considered the role of many variables in trauma causation (e.g., Agarwal, 1980;Åström et al, 1987;Barber, 1973;Björnstig et al, 1991;Buhr and Cooke, 1959;Busch et al, 1986;Cogbill et al, 1991;Donaldson et al, 1990;Fife and Barancik, 1985;Fife et al, 1984;Garraway et al, 1979;Grimm, 1980;Johansson et al, 1991;Jónsson et al, 1992;Jones, 1990;Knowelden et al, 1964;Madhock et al, 1993;Nilsson et al, 1991;Prince et al, 1993;Ralis, 1986;Sahlin, 1990;Shaheen et al, 1990;Zylke, 1990) and provides valuable aids for the interpretation of fractures in antiquity, particularly with regard to skeletal patterning and the contexts of injury.…”