1990
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(90)90115-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of accidental fractures and dislocations in Saudi Arabia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are mainly workers involved in travels, transporting goods and services across the country. The vulnerability of the young adult male is consistent with findings [12] [18]- [20] from other parts of the world.…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are mainly workers involved in travels, transporting goods and services across the country. The vulnerability of the young adult male is consistent with findings [12] [18]- [20] from other parts of the world.…”
Section: Epidemiologysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Road traffic accident is currently the commonest cause of traumatic joint dislocations in Nigeria, with figures as high as 62% -95% being recorded [7]- [10] Similarly high figures have been reported in India [11] as well as Saudi Arabia [12]. The hip joint is an inherently stable joint, requiring high velocity forces or energy to dislocate it; Posterior hip dislocation usually occur in a road accident when someone seated in a truck or car is thrown forward, striking the knee against the dashboard.…”
Section: Aetiopathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 Additionally, according to a 1994 review, 19 the most often injured body regions were the upper and lower extremities, and the head. A study conducted during 1990 25 showed that 14% of the cases of accidental fractures and dislocations were due to RTA. It was reported that 79.2% of patients admitted with spinal injuries between the years 1971 and 1997 had sustained their injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evaluation must consider three types of information: 1) the characteristics of the fracture itself; 2) the skeletal pattern of trauma in the individual and the population; and 3) the social, culture historical, and/or environmental context of the human remains, including the presence of artifacts. Clinical research has considered the role of many variables in trauma causation (e.g., Agarwal, 1980;Åström et al, 1987;Barber, 1973;Björnstig et al, 1991;Buhr and Cooke, 1959;Busch et al, 1986;Cogbill et al, 1991;Donaldson et al, 1990;Fife and Barancik, 1985;Fife et al, 1984;Garraway et al, 1979;Grimm, 1980;Johansson et al, 1991;Jónsson et al, 1992;Jones, 1990;Knowelden et al, 1964;Madhock et al, 1993;Nilsson et al, 1991;Prince et al, 1993;Ralis, 1986;Sahlin, 1990;Shaheen et al, 1990;Zylke, 1990) and provides valuable aids for the interpretation of fractures in antiquity, particularly with regard to skeletal patterning and the contexts of injury.…”
Section: Interpreting the Ultimate Cause Of Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%