Patterns of accountability: an organizational approach to community engagement in museums.

Abstract

This paper considers the divergent and often contradictory registers of ‘community engagement’ in contemporary UK museum practice. The paper draws on an organizational study of a large local authority museum service and focuses on how community engagement is constructed across a range of museum professionals who use it for different purposes and outcomes. I argue that different departments make sense of community engagement through four patterns of accountability, each with complimentary and divergent logics reflecting a wider range of museum functions, demands and pressures. The tensions that arise are discussed. In the final part, the notion of ‘relational accountability’ (Moncrieffe 2011) is introduced to re-settle these divergent logics in order to argue for community engagement work that is grounded in a relational practice. The paper contributes to further theoretical and practical engagement with the work of participation in museums by bringing forward an organizational view to highlight the ways in which museum practice is mediated within organizational frames.

Redefining Curatorial Leadership and Activating Community Expertise to Build Equitable and Inclusive Art Museums

“…Working collaboratively with communities to redefine curatorial programs is one means to apply network governance or collaborative leadership models to art museum practices. While museums may follow different models of working with communities, and curators may claim their own levels of accountability in relation to their working practices and community engagement (Morse, 2018), we wonder how might this relationship between museums and their communities begin to inform leadership?…”

Mobilising the Energy in Store: stored collections, enthusiast experts and the ecology of heritage

“…The division of labour in large museums means that stored objects bear increasingly multiple relationships even internally. Stored collections are mediated by different departments with different forms of accountability and different agendas (curators, conservators, learning teams and PR, for example) (Morse, 2018). These departments sometimes have conflicting processes and narratives.…”

Muhammad at the Museum: Or, Why the Prophet Is Not Present

“…(Graham-Harrison 2015) According to The Guardian in 2015 "no sacred images of Muhammad are on public display in the UK" (Graham-Harrison 2015). This is a reflection of the strong 'tolerance and community engagement' framing of the British museum sector (Crooke 2007;Sandell 2007;Morse 2018).…”