2000
DOI: 10.2307/3803255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Artificial Nest Depredation in a Large Floodplain Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods have been developed to minimize the potential biases of using artificial nests. These methods include weathering (Rangen et al 2000), adding natural materials to artificial nests (Wilcove 1985), and rigorous attempts to reduce human odors associated with artificial nests (Bergan et al 1997, Donovan et al 1997, Lewis and Montevecchi 1999, DeGraaf et al 1999, Knutson et al 2000, Rangen et al 2000, 2001). In our study, weathering nests did not affect predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods have been developed to minimize the potential biases of using artificial nests. These methods include weathering (Rangen et al 2000), adding natural materials to artificial nests (Wilcove 1985), and rigorous attempts to reduce human odors associated with artificial nests (Bergan et al 1997, Donovan et al 1997, Lewis and Montevecchi 1999, DeGraaf et al 1999, Knutson et al 2000, Rangen et al 2000, 2001). In our study, weathering nests did not affect predation risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to understand how avian communities change with urbanization it is necessary to examine the underlying variation in demographic patterns. Nest predation causes most reproductive failure in birds (Ricklefs 1969, Hatchwell et al 1999, Buler and Hamilton 2000, Knutson et al 2000) and has thus become a focus of many studies examining the impacts of habitat alterations on avian demography, especially that of habitat fragmentation and edge effects (for reviews see Paton 1994 and Chalfoun et al 2002). Predator communities may differ between natural and urbanizing habitats, but relative patterns of increasing and decreasing predator abundance may be scale‐dependent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of habitat patch characteristics on nest success, especially distance to edge, vary among species, habitats and regions (reviewed in Paton 1994, Andrén 1995, Lahti 2001, Batary & Baldi 2004); however, the general conclusion to be drawn from these studies is that there is support for edge effects in some landscape or biogeographical contexts. Some studies have found a relationship between nest success and riparian corridor width/patch size (Chapa 1996, Vander Haegan & DeGraaf 1996, Knutson et al . 2000, but see Tewksbury et al .…”
Section: Multiscale Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of habitat patch characteristics on nest success, especially distance to edge, vary among species, habitats and regions (reviewed in Paton 1994, Andrén 1995, Lahti 2001, Batary & Baldi 2004; however, the general conclusion to be drawn from these studies is that there is support for edge effects in some landscape or biogeographical contexts. Some studies have found a relationship between nest success and riparian corridor width/patch size (Chapa 1996, Vander Haegan & DeGraaf 1996, Knutson et al 2000, but see Tewksbury et al 1998 and between nest success and edge type (Chapa 1996, Suarez et al 1997, Saracco & Collazo 1999, but see Tewksbury et al 1998. Peak et al (2004) and Knutson et al (2004) did not find strong effects of riparian forest corridor width or patch area, and suggest that patch or width effects will not be detectable in highly fragmented landscapes because nest predation rates are high throughout habitat patches in these landscapes.…”
Section: Habitat and Nest-site Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the upland forests and floodplain forests on our study sites have had several decades, and likely more than a century, to develop (Cahayla‐Wynne & Glenn‐Lewin ; Guyon et al ). Our study area contains many, relatively large (>200 ha) stands of mature, closed‐canopy forest (Knutson et al ). Gaps in otherwise closed‐canopy forests on our study sites are created by backwater sloughs, roads, railroads, and creeks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%