2022
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-164988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Care and Clinical Outcomes in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas: The Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) and Molecular Epidemiology Resource (LEO-MER) Prospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) and Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) Prospective Cohort study highlighted continued poor outcomes of CHOP‐based induction chemotherapy from a large cohort ( N = 1132) of patients with PTCL treated in the contemporary era (2002 to 2020). Two‐year event‐free survival and 3‐year overall survival (OS) estimates were 46%–52% and 58%–61%, with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) having superior survival and PTCL–not otherwise specified (NOS) and angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL) having inferior outcomes 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) and Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) Prospective Cohort study highlighted continued poor outcomes of CHOP‐based induction chemotherapy from a large cohort ( N = 1132) of patients with PTCL treated in the contemporary era (2002 to 2020). Two‐year event‐free survival and 3‐year overall survival (OS) estimates were 46%–52% and 58%–61%, with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) having superior survival and PTCL–not otherwise specified (NOS) and angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL) having inferior outcomes 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-year event-free survival and 3-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 46%-52% and 58%-61%, with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) having superior survival and PTCL-not otherwise specified (NOS) and angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL) having inferior outcomes. 3 Several prognostic scores incorporating laboratory and clinical features have been proposed for PTCL, including the classical international prognostic index (IPI), age-adjusted IPI, the PINK-E score (incorporating age, stage, distant lymph node involvement, non-nasal type disease, and EBV-DNA) for extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, 4 and the T-cell score (incorporating age, stage, low albumin, and high absolute neutrophil count) derived from the international T-cell lymphoma project. 5 Increasingly, molecular profiling will improve risk stratification and help to tailor treatment for patients with PTCL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%