2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Chinook salmon migration and residency in the Salmon River estuary (Oregon)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As I elaborate on later, such projects are far more successful when they move away from structural fixes and focus on process-based restoration and identification of those factors limiting recovery of a fishery (e.g. as in Bottom et al 2005). …”
Section: Relevance To Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I elaborate on later, such projects are far more successful when they move away from structural fixes and focus on process-based restoration and identification of those factors limiting recovery of a fishery (e.g. as in Bottom et al 2005). …”
Section: Relevance To Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem functions performed by wetlands, such as food and nutrient production, contaminant filtration, breeding and feeding habitat provision, become considerably impaired as wetland area diminishes (Schlenger et al, in review). Wetland losses particularly impact Chinook populations, since these shoreforms provide significant habitat during juvenile growth stages (Bottom et al 2005;Fresh 2006). …”
Section: Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Marsh samples than Reference High Marsh samples. This is consistent with Gray (2005) findings from Salmon River Estuary in Oregon, comparing benthic invertebrates in newly restored marsh to older restored and reference marshes, with Chironomidae larvae highly associated with decaying plant materials that occur in high marsh after initial inundation by salt water after a dike removal. High marsh Removal samples had fewer Annelida and Nematoda taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In Snohomish River Estuary, Washington, Tanner et al (2002) found restored marsh sites to have lower diversity of invertebrates (Shannon-Weiner index and taxa richness) than Reference sites, though relative abundances were quite similar. In Salmon River Estuary, Oregon, Gray et al (2005) reported average greater density of invertebrates in Reference marsh samples and important differences between community structure between reference and restored marshes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%