2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Emotional Expression and Responses to Health and Illness in Women With Functional Voice Disorders (MTVD) and a Comparison Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other terms such as ‘hyperfunctional’, ‘non‐organic’ or ‘muscle tension dysphonia’ are considered synonymous. The aetiology of functional dysphonia is multifactorial and includes technical misuse, vocal strain and overuse, and stress . Where psychological stress is the primary causing and maintaining factor, patients are more accurately diagnosed with psychogenic dysphonia, and treated accordingly .…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other terms such as ‘hyperfunctional’, ‘non‐organic’ or ‘muscle tension dysphonia’ are considered synonymous. The aetiology of functional dysphonia is multifactorial and includes technical misuse, vocal strain and overuse, and stress . Where psychological stress is the primary causing and maintaining factor, patients are more accurately diagnosed with psychogenic dysphonia, and treated accordingly .…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aetiology of functional dysphonia is multifactorial and includes technical misuse, vocal strain and overuse, and stress. [6][7][8][9][10] Where psychological stress is the primary causing and maintaining factor, patients are more accurately diagnosed with psychogenic dysphonia, and treated accordingly. 11 Functional dysphonia can lead to laryngeal pathology.…”
Section: Voice Therapy For Functional (Non-organic) Dysphoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations between TAS-20 and LEAS have consistently been negative, albeit not significant (Simson et al, 2002 ; Bydlowski et al, 2005 ; Subic-Wrana et al, 2005 ; Parling et al, 2010 ; Baker et al, 2014 ; Lane et al, 2015a ). For healthy participants (including healthy controls) the results have been mixed, with a few studies showing positive correlations (Lundh et al, 2002 ; Waller and Scheidt, 2004 ; Bydlowski et al, 2005 ) although most studies show a negative association (Lane et al, 1998b ; Subic-Wrana et al, 2001 ; Lumley et al, 2005 ; Parling et al, 2010 ; Igarashi et al, 2011 ; Baeza-Velasco et al, 2012 ; Baker et al, 2014 ; Lichev et al, 2014 ; Maroti et al, 2017 ). In the few studies including medical conditions (or medical controls), the results have also been mixed, with some studies showing positive associations (Baeza-Velasco et al, 2012 ; Maroti et al, 2017 ), while others do not (Consoli et al, 2009 ; Lane et al, 2015a ; Burger et al, 2016 ; Neumann et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores for each scale indicate more maladaptive responses. The reliability and validity of the IBQ-31 have been demonstrated across a range of medical conditions [19,24,25].…”
Section: Illness Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%