2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-018-0425-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of homozygosity in insular and continental goat breeds

Abstract: BackgroundGenetic isolation of breeds may result in a significant loss of diversity and have consequences on health and performance. In this study, we examined the effect of geographic isolation on caprine genetic diversity patterns by genotyping 480 individuals from 25 European and African breeds with the Goat SNP50 BeadChip and comparing patterns of homozygosity of insular and nearby continental breeds.ResultsAmong the breeds analysed, number and total length of ROH varied considerably and depending on breed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative measure of inbreeding was based on the proportion of the genome covered by runs of homozygosity (ROH) (F ROH ) relative to the length of the autosome covered by SNP computed using the R package detec-tRUNS (Biscarini et al, 2018). ROH was detected using a sliding window size of 15 SNP, a threshold of overlapping windows of the same state (homozygous/heterozygous) to call an SNP in a run was 0.1, minimum number of SNP in a run of 15 and a maximum number of heterozygous SNP in a sliding window of 1, in agreement with parameters used in a previous study on continental and insular goat breeds (Cardoso et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…An alternative measure of inbreeding was based on the proportion of the genome covered by runs of homozygosity (ROH) (F ROH ) relative to the length of the autosome covered by SNP computed using the R package detec-tRUNS (Biscarini et al, 2018). ROH was detected using a sliding window size of 15 SNP, a threshold of overlapping windows of the same state (homozygous/heterozygous) to call an SNP in a run was 0.1, minimum number of SNP in a run of 15 and a maximum number of heterozygous SNP in a sliding window of 1, in agreement with parameters used in a previous study on continental and insular goat breeds (Cardoso et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For both POP A and B 284 it was possible to identify short and long segments in most of the animals analyzed, whereas 285 in the POP C a small number of animals (n = 7) presented ROH8-16 Mb and none ROH>16 Mb. 286 In recent years, some studies have investigated different genomic methods to estimate 287 inbreeding coefficients in cattle [12,25,26,45,47,48], pigs [27,28,49,50], goats [51][52][53] and 288 rainbow trout [32]. However, this is the first study aimed at characterizing the ROH patterns 289 and comparing different genomic-and pedigree-based methods to estimate inbreeding 290 coefficients in farmed coho salmon populations.…”
Section: Genomics-and Pedigree-based Inbreeding 278mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, monitoring and managing the inbreeding levels is critical in the 50 operation of genetic improvement programs [8][9][10]. 51 Inbreeding is traditionally calculated using pedigree records, the estimates might not 52 reflect the true inbreeding level due to 1) the stochastic nature of recombination, 2) the 53 assumption that there are no changes in allele frequencies in time and 3) the persistence of 54 ancestral short segments through time [11]. In addition this approach fails to capture the 55 relatedness among founder animals from the base population [12].…”
Section: Introduction 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[68], Cardoso et al [69] and Colli et al [70], and some of them were also used for detection of CNV using 50 K SNP chip data, as reported by Liu et al [17]. A list of the breeds, populations and samples sizes used in the analysis is given in Table 4 while a full list of individual samples can be found in Supplementary Table 7 (Additional file 1).…”
Section: Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%