r 2011
DOI: 10.20955/r.93.169-186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Interstate Migration in the United States from the Survey of Income and Program Participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As marriage and childbearing may interact with migration dynamically (Nedoluzhko and Agadjanian 2010), these time-varying controls are lagged by one year to guard against possible reverse causality. Migration propensities are conditioned by employment characteristics; specifically, unemployed individuals are typically more likely to migrate than those who are employed (Haurin and Haurin 1988;Hernández-Murillo et al 2011). Accordingly, our analyses control for gainful employment in year t-1 (employed vs. not employed).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As marriage and childbearing may interact with migration dynamically (Nedoluzhko and Agadjanian 2010), these time-varying controls are lagged by one year to guard against possible reverse causality. Migration propensities are conditioned by employment characteristics; specifically, unemployed individuals are typically more likely to migrate than those who are employed (Haurin and Haurin 1988;Hernández-Murillo et al 2011). Accordingly, our analyses control for gainful employment in year t-1 (employed vs. not employed).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 In addition, although movers tend to be healthier than stayers, the characteristics of destination states (eg, foreclosure rates, school rankings, income, homicide rates) tend to be similar or worse than origin states. 58,59 This may explain why recent research concluded that interstate mortality trends are not explained by a healthy migrant effect or interstate migration patterns. 58 The reasons for these collective findings are unclear, but a study of rural-to-urban migration may shed some light.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding mining, farming, and utilities to the list of industries tied to the local economy has little effect on these percentages. In addition, research on interstate migration found that migration rates are higher for higher wage workers and more educated workers (Hernández-Murillo et al, 2011; Knapp et al, 2013; Malamud & Wozniak, 2012; Rodgers & Rodgers, 2000). These findings are supportive of our expectations regarding low-wage workers.…”
Section: Results Using Census-based Tax Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%