2021
DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000001006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Language Impairment in Early Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Abstract: Objective.To investigate the incidence and nature of language change and its relationship to executive dysfunction in a population-based incident ALS sample, with the hypothesis that patterns of frontotemporal involvement in early ALS extend beyond areas of executive control to regions associated with language processing.Methods.One hundred and seventeen population-based incident ALS cases without dementia and 100 controls matched by age, sex and education were included in the study. A detailed assessment of l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the face of the abovementioned considerations on the potential biases of the ECAS‐Language, and consistently with earlier reports [ 8 , 9 ], this work appears to confirm that attention and executive functioning are strong determinants of language in non‐demented ALS patients—also showing that dysexecutive features are associated with LI in this population. Nevertheless, a notable amount of variance (i.e., 46.6%) in ECAS‐Language scores could not be accounted for by either executive performances or other variables, this supporting the previously acknowledged notion of LI being primary, at least to an extent, in this population [ 8 , 9 ] and not merely secondary to executive dysfunction [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even in the face of the abovementioned considerations on the potential biases of the ECAS‐Language, and consistently with earlier reports [ 8 , 9 ], this work appears to confirm that attention and executive functioning are strong determinants of language in non‐demented ALS patients—also showing that dysexecutive features are associated with LI in this population. Nevertheless, a notable amount of variance (i.e., 46.6%) in ECAS‐Language scores could not be accounted for by either executive performances or other variables, this supporting the previously acknowledged notion of LI being primary, at least to an extent, in this population [ 8 , 9 ] and not merely secondary to executive dysfunction [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Relatedly, such findings might not be fully generalizable to languages other than Italian: for instance, a recent report comparing Italian to English patients with progressive non‐fluent aphasia—which is a condition pathophysiologically and genetically related to ALS [ 11 ]—has shown between‐language differences in speech praxis and morpho‐syntactic processing [ 43 ]. At the same time, it is worth stressing that, as previously mentioned, the prevalence estimate given here is similar overall to those recently reported in non‐demented ALS patients speaking other languages, that is, English [ 9 ] and German [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[2][3][4] Behavioral symptoms, such as apathy, are also observed. 4,5 Language is frequently affected in sporadic ALS (sALS), 6,7 with reduced performance in naming tests, as well as in tasks assessing semantics in the comprehension of isolated words or sentences, 8 in syntactic comprehension and expression with failures in the use and interpretation of essential syntactic elements for the construction and adequate understanding of sentences, 7,9,10 and orthographic processing by duplicating, omitting or substituting graphemes in regular words or making regularizations in irregular words. 7 The ability to organize narrative discourse is also impaired, 11 characterized by discourse inadequacy, connectedness failures, and difficulty in maintaining a narrative theme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%