2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of mother–infant interaction from 3 to 12 months among dyads with substance abuse and psychiatric problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison group data of 28 mother–infant dyads were gathered from another Norwegian study. These dyads were recruited from local well-baby clinics in Oslo, Norway, between December 2004–January 2009 (Siqveland et al 2014 ). Inclusion criteria were being pregnant and having no substance abuse or mental disorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison group data of 28 mother–infant dyads were gathered from another Norwegian study. These dyads were recruited from local well-baby clinics in Oslo, Norway, between December 2004–January 2009 (Siqveland et al 2014 ). Inclusion criteria were being pregnant and having no substance abuse or mental disorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty percent of randomly selected interactions were double-rated and inter-rater reliability was calculated using categorical agreement (1–2, 3, 4–5). Intra-class correlation varied between 0.80 and 0.97 at 3 months and between 0.73 and 0.94 at 12 months for the different subscales used in the study (Siqveland et al 2014 ). The coders were blinded to all information about the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data for comparison of mother-infant interactions were included from another Norwegian study. The comparison group consisted of 30 mother-infant dyads, recruited from local well-baby clinics in Oslo, Norway, between December 2004 – January 2009 [26]. Inclusion criteria for the comparison group were being pregnant and having no substance abuse or mental health problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both coders double-rated 20% of randomly selected interactions, and inter-rater reliability was calculated using categorical agreement (1-2, 3, 4-5). Intra-class correlation varied between 0.80 and 0.97 for the different subscales used in the study [26]. All information, including group status (no mental health problems vs. substance abuse or mental health problems), was unknown to the coders.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%