2015
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arv132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of parasitism in the cooperatively breeding meerkat: a cost of dominance for females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
2
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither FAM nor social status was predictive of strongyle abundance. With the exception of weight, other potentially influential covariables [16] were unrelated to parasitism after including FAM in the models (figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Neither FAM nor social status was predictive of strongyle abundance. With the exception of weight, other potentially influential covariables [16] were unrelated to parasitism after including FAM in the models (figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focal subjects, from 12 clans (or groups), were 37 sexually mature female meerkats (11 dominant, 25 subordinate and 1 that achieved dominant status during the study and is represented in both social classes). Details about meerkat identification and monitoring can be found elsewhere [16].…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Study Site And Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Upon acquiring dominance, male and female meerkats experience energetic costs that could further limit their immune function: notably, males engage in energetically expensive bouts of scent marking and mate guarding [39], and females, beyond engaging in dominance assertions and aggressively targeting subordinate dams [72], are frequently pregnant [32,33,41,73]. Yet, consistent with immunocompetence in other species [74,75] and with parasitism in meerkats [23], we found no evidence that pregnancy, per se , was linked to immunosuppression. Our analysis, however, was limited to subordinate females, so we were unable to determine if relationships between immune function and pregnancy differed by social status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%