2016
DOI: 10.1108/jd-08-2015-0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of perceived public library outcomes in five countries

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to compare the perceived benefits of public libraries between five culturally different countries: Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, South Korea and the USA. Design/methodology/approach – The data were based on representative samples of Finnish, Norwegian, Dutch, Korean and American adult library users. In Finland a mail survey was used and in other countries web surveys were used for data collectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 indicates that the top five aspects were educational opportunities (87.3 percent), self-education (82.4 percent), reading non-fiction (77.5 percent), reading fiction (71.1 percent), and interest in nature (68.1 percent). Similar to the cross-country study conducted by Vakkari et al (2016), Singang Library users benefited most in reading and self-education; like South Korea and USA, educational opportunities were among the top five benefits; however, interest in nature (outdoor activities) was not among the five most popular benefits in their study. The benefits in the 22 areas of daily life were then clustered through factor analysis, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Perceived Outcomes Of Singang Librarymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 indicates that the top five aspects were educational opportunities (87.3 percent), self-education (82.4 percent), reading non-fiction (77.5 percent), reading fiction (71.1 percent), and interest in nature (68.1 percent). Similar to the cross-country study conducted by Vakkari et al (2016), Singang Library users benefited most in reading and self-education; like South Korea and USA, educational opportunities were among the top five benefits; however, interest in nature (outdoor activities) was not among the five most popular benefits in their study. The benefits in the 22 areas of daily life were then clustered through factor analysis, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Perceived Outcomes Of Singang Librarymentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Finally, several previous studies reveal that there are correlations between library use and social capital (Johnson 2010;Johnson and Griffis 2009), library use and library as a place (Aabø, Audunson and Vårheim 2010), library use and perceived outcomes (Vakkari et al, 2016), library use and library value (Aabø 2005), and social capital and library as a place (Aabø, Audunson and Vårheim 2010); furthermore, because library as a place is one kind of library use, it may exist correlation between library as a place and perceived outcomes.…”
Section: Research Objective and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equally, analyses of public library outcomes and the larger social role that they play at national levels have been published by academic researchers. For example: Vakkari et al (2015) compare the perceived benefits of public library usage across five culturally different countries (Finland, Norway, the Netherlands, South Korea and the USA), and highlight the differences in societal outcomes for the public library services in each country; Spacey et al (2015) consider the extent of role of the public library in providing access to online information to the general public in the UK.…”
Section: Literature Review: the Role Of Public Libraries And Measuremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is imperative for public libraries of any type or size to take a step forward and start using new technologies to improve the quality of services they provide. Public libraries in developing countries have to accept the fact that the transitional process is not only technologically challenging, but also culturally and organizationally, since patrons in different countries perceive the benefits they derive from the public library rather differently, which makes this change significantly harder to achieve (Vakkari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%