2015
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of prescription and adherence to European Association of Urology guidelines on androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: an Italian multicentre cross‐sectional analysis from the Choosing Treatment for Prostate Cancer (CHOICE) study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo evaluate both the patterns of prescription of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and the adherence to European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for ADT prescription. MethodsThe Choosing Treatment for Prostate Cancer (CHOICE) study was an Italian multicentre cross-sectional study conducted between December 2010 and January 2012. A total of 1 386 patients, treated with ADT for PCa (first prescription or renewal of ADT), were selected. With regard to the E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adherence to national and international guidelines is suboptimal throughout Europe [17,18,19]. This is particularly true when considering urological diseases.…”
Section: Variation In Practice and Consequences Of Non-adherence To Cpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Adherence to national and international guidelines is suboptimal throughout Europe [17,18,19]. This is particularly true when considering urological diseases.…”
Section: Variation In Practice and Consequences Of Non-adherence To Cpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when considering adherence to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the prescription and use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in Italian men with prostate cancer, approximately 1 out of 4 patients received ADT when this was not recommended by evidence-based guidelines [18]. This, in turn, increased the risk of short- and long-term side effects, and the costs related to disease management.…”
Section: Variation In Practice and Consequences Of Non-adherence To Cpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aunque las GPC utilizadas no son de obligado cumplimiento, están avaladas por una prestigiosa sociedad médica. Estos resultados concuerdan con los de otros estudios similares 4,5 . Por tanto el alto porcentaje de falta de seguimiento de las mismas debe invitar a una reflexión sobre el grado de cumplimiento de las recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia y también sobre el éxito conseguido en la difusión y aplicación de las diferentes GPC.…”
unclassified