2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74938-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Synchrony in Complex Networks of Adaptively Coupled Oscillators

Abstract: Collective phenomena in systems of interconnected dynamical units are omnipresent in nature. The swarm behavior in flocks of birds or schools of fish, the synchronous flashing of fireflies or even coherent spiking of neurons in the human brain are just a few examples of collective motion. Elucidating the mechanisms that give rise to synchronization is crucial in order to understand biological self-organization. For this sake, the theory of dynamical networks has been successfully applied over the last decades … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
(305 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synchronization is an important feature of the dynamics in networks of coupled nonlinear oscillators Pikovsky et al (2001), Strogatz (2001), Albert and Barabási (2002), Newman (2003), Boccaletti et al (2018), Berner (2021). Various synchronization patterns are known such as cluster synchronization where the network splits into groups of synchronous elements Dahms et al (2012), or partial synchronization patterns such as chimera states where the system splits into coexisting domains of coherent (synchronized) and incoherent (desynchronized) states Kuramoto and Battogtokh (2002), Abrams and Strogatz (2004), Panaggio and Abrams (2015), Sawicki (2019), Schöll (2020), Schöll et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronization is an important feature of the dynamics in networks of coupled nonlinear oscillators Pikovsky et al (2001), Strogatz (2001), Albert and Barabási (2002), Newman (2003), Boccaletti et al (2018), Berner (2021). Various synchronization patterns are known such as cluster synchronization where the network splits into groups of synchronous elements Dahms et al (2012), or partial synchronization patterns such as chimera states where the system splits into coexisting domains of coherent (synchronized) and incoherent (desynchronized) states Kuramoto and Battogtokh (2002), Abrams and Strogatz (2004), Panaggio and Abrams (2015), Sawicki (2019), Schöll (2020), Schöll et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest are adaptive networks in which connectivity changes are related to intrinsic nodal dynamics (Gross and Blasius, 2008;Berner, 2021). For example, these types of networks can model synaptic neuronal plasticity (Meisel and Gross, 2009;Markram et al, 2011), chemical (Jain and Krishna, 2001;Kuehn, 2019), epidemic (Gross et al, 2006), biological, and social systems (Horstmeyer and Kuehn, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other relevant applications are communication, supply, and transportation networks, for instance power grids, subway networks, or airtraffic networks 54 . Moreover, multilayer networks are also known to generate and stabilize diverse partial synchronization patterns in adaptive networks 55,56 , where the connectivity changes in time 57 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%