2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.033309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pauli blocking factors in quantum pumps

Abstract: We investigate the Pauli blocking factor in quantum pumps using Floquet formalism. Even though the time dependent potentials in quantum pumping can not only cause inelastic scatterings but also break the micro-reversibility, i.e. $T^+(E',E) \neq T^-(E,E')$, the Pauli blocking factor is unnecessary when the scattering process through the scatterer is coherent. The well defined scattering states extending from one reservoir to the others form a complete non-orthogonal set. Regardless of the non-orthogonality one… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
20
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(42 reference statements)
8
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron pump is driven by periodical modulation of potentials which share the same spatial coordinates with the confining potentials which preserve reflection symmetry of the system. Most of our numerical results agree with the conclusions from Floquet scattering theory 28,29 , except for the general inversion symmetry (GIV) ( setup f in Fig.1 ). In contrast with the theoretical prediction that the adiabatic pumped current I ad ≈ 0 for this spatial symmetry, our numerical calculation shows that the pumped current is finite and further investigation reveals that there is an approximate symmetry relation of the current as setup e at small magnetic field, which is the experimental setup 8 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electron pump is driven by periodical modulation of potentials which share the same spatial coordinates with the confining potentials which preserve reflection symmetry of the system. Most of our numerical results agree with the conclusions from Floquet scattering theory 28,29 , except for the general inversion symmetry (GIV) ( setup f in Fig.1 ). In contrast with the theoretical prediction that the adiabatic pumped current I ad ≈ 0 for this spatial symmetry, our numerical calculation shows that the pumped current is finite and further investigation reveals that there is an approximate symmetry relation of the current as setup e at small magnetic field, which is the experimental setup 8 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Six spatial symmetries studied in Ref. 29 are considered, both at the adiabatic and non-adiabatic cases, which are instantaneous up-down (IUD), left-right (ILR), and inversion symmetries (IIV) and the corresponding non-instantaneous/general up-down (GUD), left-right (GLR), and inversion symmetries (GIV), respectively (see Fig.1). The electron pump is driven by periodical modulation of potentials which share the same spatial coordinates with the confining potentials which preserve reflection symmetry of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28, 29 The spin current and charge current at lead R are defined as I Secondly, when certain amount of spin current is pumped out at lead R, there should be equal amount of spin current with opposite polarization pumped out at lead L. Furthermore, if this symmetry is combined with current conservation condition, spin current formula can be simplified to a more convenient form in calculation:…”
Section: Model and Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We derive the current using these scattering states. The time dependent electron field operator can be obtained in the following form [17,18,19] …”
Section: A Directed Charge Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These symmetries are only applied to the time independent part of the scattering potential, which is V n (r) in Eq. (25), with an arbitrary φ, so that they are not necessarily kept intact during the pumping cycle [37].…”
Section: Magnetic Field Inversion Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%