2005
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pavlovian Conditioning: A Functional Perspective

Abstract: From a functional perspective, Pavlovian conditioning involves learning about conditioned stimuli (CSs) that have a pre-existing relation to an unconditioned stimulus (US) rather than learning about arbitrary or neutral CSs. In addition, the most important product of learning involves changes in how the organism responds to the US, not in how it responds to the CS, because the US is the more biologically relevant stimulus. These concepts are illustrated using examples from a variety of behavioral and physiolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
200
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
9
200
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that progestins, rather than E 2 , may underlie the hormonal effects on conditioning observed. Furthermore, they are commensurate with the findings from other laboratories which demonstrate that conditioning to sexuallyrelevant stimuli can occur readily (Domjan, 2005;Paredes and Alonso, 1997) with even a one-trial conditioned place preference approach. As discussed below, typically 4 or 6 pairings is necessary when hormones are administered alone without being paired with sexually-relevant stimuli.…”
Section: Progestins Estrogen and Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings suggest that progestins, rather than E 2 , may underlie the hormonal effects on conditioning observed. Furthermore, they are commensurate with the findings from other laboratories which demonstrate that conditioning to sexuallyrelevant stimuli can occur readily (Domjan, 2005;Paredes and Alonso, 1997) with even a one-trial conditioned place preference approach. As discussed below, typically 4 or 6 pairings is necessary when hormones are administered alone without being paired with sexually-relevant stimuli.…”
Section: Progestins Estrogen and Conditioningsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…During behavioral estrus (proestrus), when rats are most receptive to mating, acquisition of conditioned avoidance responses is reduced compared to on diestrous (Diaz-Veliz et al, 2000), which may enable aversive aspects of mating to be tolerated. Environmental stimuli associated with mating, when E 2 and progestin levels are elevated, readily become conditioned stimuli (Domjan, 2005). For example, rats that have high E 2 and progestin levels readily learn to show preference for a setting associated with mating (Frye et al, 1998;Gonzalez-Flores et al, 2004;Oldenburger et al, 1992;Paredes and Alonso, 1997).…”
Section: Progestins Estrogen and Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unusual temporal parameters of CTA learning have raised questions about whether this learning involves unique signaling mechanisms, which might imply that the patterns of coincident activation in the amygdala revealed here are unique to the CTA paradigm (23,24). Arguing against this notion is an accumulating literature which shows that CTA learning has fundamental similarities with other associative learning paradigms, including a short-term and long-term memory phase (25,26) and heavy reliance on signaling pathways such as cAMP response element-binding (CREB) protein (27) and protein kinase A (PKA) (28) in the amygdala.…”
Section: Us Responses Are Enhanced For Forward-conditioned (Cs-us) Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike CRs, the unconditioned response (UCR) produced by the aversive UCS is typically characterized as an unlearned response. However, learning-related changes in UCRs have been observed in prior Pavlovian conditioning research (Domjan, 2005). Specifically, CS-UCS pairings attenuate UCR amplitude relative to a UCS presented alone (Kimble andOst, 1961, andKimmel, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%