2013
DOI: 10.1242/dev.099028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pax9 regulates a molecular network involving Bmp4, Fgf10, Shh signaling and the Osr2 transcription factor to control palate morphogenesis

Abstract: Cleft palate is one of the most common birth defects in humans. Whereas gene knockout studies in mice have shown that both the Osr2 and Pax9 transcription factors are essential regulators of palatogenesis, little is known about the molecular mechanisms involving these transcription factors in palate development. We report here that Pax9 plays a crucial role in patterning the anterior-posterior axis and outgrowth of the developing palatal shelves. We found that tissue-specific deletion of Pax9 in the palatal me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
156
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
156
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the changes in Osr2 and Pax9 expression were more pronounced in the middle palate than in the posterior palate, and thus did not correlate with the relative severities of the elevation defect. Furthermore, while the morphologies of the anterior and middle palate are very similar between Pax9 −/− mutants and Wnt1-Cre;Ldb1 fl/- mutants (such as the absence of the indentation medial to the upper molar) [26,27], the phenotypes differ in the posterior palate. In Pax9 −/− mutants, the posterior palate became horizontal by E15.5, indicating that there is a delay but not a failure in palatal elevation [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the changes in Osr2 and Pax9 expression were more pronounced in the middle palate than in the posterior palate, and thus did not correlate with the relative severities of the elevation defect. Furthermore, while the morphologies of the anterior and middle palate are very similar between Pax9 −/− mutants and Wnt1-Cre;Ldb1 fl/- mutants (such as the absence of the indentation medial to the upper molar) [26,27], the phenotypes differ in the posterior palate. In Pax9 −/− mutants, the posterior palate became horizontal by E15.5, indicating that there is a delay but not a failure in palatal elevation [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palatal cell proliferation was analyzed as described previously (Lan et al, 2004;Xu et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2013). The numbers of BrdU-labeled nuclei and total nuclei were recorded for five independent control and mutant littermate pairs.…”
Section: Histology Western Blotting Cell Proliferation Analysis Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skeletal preparations of E18 and P0 pups were performed as described previously (Liu et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2013).…”
Section: Histology Western Blotting Cell Proliferation Analysis Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34] Osr2 is involved in regulating palatal shelf elevation and functions as a downstream target of Pax9 during palatogenesis. [35,36] The downregulation of Runx2 (-2.66 fold; p<0.05) and Osr2 (-2.08 fold; p<0.01) in CL/Fr tissues may indicate a secondary effect resulting in cleft palate. Further investigation is necessary to confirm the expression values of these genes and to identify their role in craniofacial morphogenesis.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%