2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11051291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pay for Being Responsible: The Effect of Target Firm’s Corporate Social Responsibility on Cross-Border Acquisition Premiums

Abstract: This study examines the effect of a target firm’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) on its cross-border acquisition premium. Building upon the resource-based view and the institutional theory, we argue that the target firm’s CSR positively affect the cross-border acquisition premium, while institutional distance, cultural distance, and the number of fellow acquisitions moderate the above relationship. Hypotheses are tested in a sample of 252 cross-border acquisitions between 1991 and 2016. Empirical findin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results also show that firms that acquired SRI-aware targets managed to improve their social and environmental performance, suggesting the ability of acquirers to learn from the targets’ SRI activities and practices. Other studies investigate the effects of ESG corporate performance on various M&A outcomes such as acquisition premiums (Gomes and Marsat, 2018; Qiao and Wu, 2019), target selection and screening process (Gomes, 2019), target valuation (Chen and Gavious, 2015), deal-related uncertainty (Arouri et al , 2019), the level of investment in mergers (Krishnamurti et al , 2020), the potential for a firm to become either a target or an acquirer (Boone and Uysal, 2020) and the post-merger market valuation (Tampakoudis and Anagnostopoulou, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results also show that firms that acquired SRI-aware targets managed to improve their social and environmental performance, suggesting the ability of acquirers to learn from the targets’ SRI activities and practices. Other studies investigate the effects of ESG corporate performance on various M&A outcomes such as acquisition premiums (Gomes and Marsat, 2018; Qiao and Wu, 2019), target selection and screening process (Gomes, 2019), target valuation (Chen and Gavious, 2015), deal-related uncertainty (Arouri et al , 2019), the level of investment in mergers (Krishnamurti et al , 2020), the potential for a firm to become either a target or an acquirer (Boone and Uysal, 2020) and the post-merger market valuation (Tampakoudis and Anagnostopoulou, 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this study with research on acquisition price levels and premia would reveal whether the value of CSR is actually reflected in the prices paid for targets with superior CSR (Gomes & Marsat, 2018, Qiao & Wu, 2019. Furthermore, observing the long-term development of an acquirer's CSR performance post-acquisition could reveal whether acquirers are in fact able to improve their own CSR with CSR resources obtained through acquiring a superior CSR target as indicated by Aktas et al (2011).…”
Section: Limitations Of This Study and Avenues For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cultural–cognitive institutional distance was determined by taking the difference between the cultural dimensions of merging firms’ countries of origin. To measure cultural–cognitive institutional distance, we followed Qiao and Wu (2019). We used a composite measure of six factors of Hofstede’s cultural dimension: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism vs collectivism, masculinity vs femininity, long-term orientation and indulgence vs restraint.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%