Paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar in Nepal: assessing catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences

Abstract

Households obtaining health care services in developing countries incur substantial costs, despite services generally being provided free of charge by public health institutions. This constitutes an economic burden on low-income households, and contributes to deepening their level of poverty. In addition to the economic burden of obtaining health care, the method of financing these payments has implications for the distribution of household assets. This effect on resource-poor households is amplified since they have decreased access to health insurance. Recent literature, however, ignores the importance of the method of financing health care payments. This paper looks at the case of Nepal and highlights the impact on households of paying for hospital-based care of Kala-azar (KA) by analysing the catastrophic, impoverishment and economic consequences of their coping strategies. The paper utilizes micro-data on a random selection of 50% of the KA-affected households of Siraha and Saptari districts of Nepal. The empirical results suggest that direct costs of hospital-based treatment of KA are catastrophic since they consume 17% of annual household income. This expenditure causes more than 20% of KA-affected households to fall below the poverty line, with the remaining households being pushed into the category of marginal poor; the poverty gap ratio is more than 90%. Further, KA incidence can have prolonged and severe economic consequences for the household economy due to the mechanisms of informal sector financing to which households resort. A heavy burden of loan repayments can lead households on a downward spiral that eventually becomes a poverty trap. In other words, the method of financing health care payments is an important ingredient in understanding the economic burden of disease.

The Household Health Spending and Impoverishment: Findings from the Households Survey in Shiraz, Iran

“…19 In the same line, other study showed that 34% of the hospitalised patients had impoverished because of medical costs. 20 Moreover, the households with higher inpatient expenses were more likely to borrow money and deplete their assets. 21 This negative impact of health expenditures on households that can lead to impoverishment has long been ignored in the health policy agenda.…”

Factors affecting catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment from medical expenses in China: policy implications of universal health insurance

“…Households in poorer quintiles are more at risk of suffering catastrophic health expenditure and their impoverishment is more common, which is similar to other studies. 22,23 The capacity to pay of the wealthiest population quintile is around 10 times higher than that of the poorest. Disparities in social, economic and environmental conditions in different regions of China also play a part in the risk of experiencing catastrophic health expenditure.…”

Removal of user fees no guarantee of universal health coverage: observations from Burkina Faso

“…In fact, it appeared that the households of 172 (75%) of the patients included in the final analysis had had to bear catastrophic health expenditures. Even when more conservative thresholds for catastrophic health expenditure were applied -15% or 25% of annual household income 17,18 many of the households of tuberculosis patients (66% and 48%, respectively) still appeared to have been faced with tuberculosis-related expenditures that were categorized as catastrophic. We therefore conclude that, in rural districts of Burkina Faso, the risk of catastrophic health expenditure associated with tuberculosis is high, even in the context of a "free" package of tuberculosis care.…”