2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0376892911000464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paying the forest for electricity: a modelling framework to market forest conservation as payment for ecosystem services benefiting hydropower generation

Abstract: SUMMARYThe operation and longevity of hydropower dams are often negatively impacted by sedimentation. Forest conservation can reduce soil erosion, and therefore efforts to maintain upstream forest cover within a watershed contribute to the economic life span of a hydropower facility. The cost of forest conservation can be viewed as an investment in hydropower and be financed via a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme. A novel modelling framework is used to estimate payments for forest conservation consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded articles developing a conceptual framework, argument or model related to PES theory, practice or the targeting of payments [4,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]; focusing on analytical issues unrelated to effectiveness and equity, such as motivations to participate in PES [31][32][33]; and those that did not include a purposive analysis of case studies, such as summary articles in special issues, the above mentioned PES reviews, and articles with anecdotal evidence on PES implementation to illustrate a related argument [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded articles developing a conceptual framework, argument or model related to PES theory, practice or the targeting of payments [4,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]; focusing on analytical issues unrelated to effectiveness and equity, such as motivations to participate in PES [31][32][33]; and those that did not include a purposive analysis of case studies, such as summary articles in special issues, the above mentioned PES reviews, and articles with anecdotal evidence on PES implementation to illustrate a related argument [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, hydropeaking may result in large changes in water depth, flow velocity, wetted area, river channel morphology, and the quantity and composition of suspended matters and water temperature [53]. A considerable number of aquatic organisms, including drift of macroinvertebrates and stranding of fish and alternations of their habitat, would be affected [54].…”
Section: Hydro Peaking Impacts On Fish Capture Yieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of SWAT in Cambodia is mostly related to hydropower. Arias et al [81] evaluated the amount of suspended sediment affected by two different land use management scenarios (forest conservation and deforestation) and corresponding impacts on hydropower operation in the Pursat 1 watershed. The results show the forest conservation scenario reduced suspended sediment flows into the reservoir, and thus improved the lifespan of the dam and associated hydropower generation.…”
Section: Swat Studies On Hydropowermentioning
confidence: 99%