2013
DOI: 10.3832/ifor0707-006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Payment for forest environmental services: a meta-analysis of successful elements

Abstract: Forest ecosystems produce environmental services from which individuals benefit. In recent decades, interest in these services has significantly increased to meet the demand for new products and services related to landscape use and recreational activities. These new products and services are defined as Non-Wood Forest Products and Services (NWFP&Ss). There is the possibility, and in certain cases the need, to introduce a system of payment for these NWFP&Ss. However, the transformation of forest environmental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impact evaluation studies do exist in the literature, but they are carried out for PES schemes implemented in threatened and degraded areas, for conservation and protection or poverty alleviation [49][50][51][52]. For PES schemes that are instead implemented the suggestions of external organisations, for example by scientific projects (i.e., solution-driven PES scheme; see 2.1.1), and that do not originate to address a threat, but rather to increase the welfare of the local communities, some have identified the successful elements for its implementation [53] or have done an ex-ante evaluation [23], but an ex-post evaluation framework is lacking. This is the context for our research, the aim of which is to investigate which bottlenecks and elements might hinder the success of a solution-driven PES scheme.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impact evaluation studies do exist in the literature, but they are carried out for PES schemes implemented in threatened and degraded areas, for conservation and protection or poverty alleviation [49][50][51][52]. For PES schemes that are instead implemented the suggestions of external organisations, for example by scientific projects (i.e., solution-driven PES scheme; see 2.1.1), and that do not originate to address a threat, but rather to increase the welfare of the local communities, some have identified the successful elements for its implementation [53] or have done an ex-ante evaluation [23], but an ex-post evaluation framework is lacking. This is the context for our research, the aim of which is to investigate which bottlenecks and elements might hinder the success of a solution-driven PES scheme.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raja Ampat as case study area provides different characteristics compared to other PES schemes outlined by most literatures. Most PES schemes are implemented on single delineated terrestrial areas, with less heterogeneous local communities, and few stakeholder organizations involved [3,9,17,23]. Raja Ampat PES-like scheme is implemented in the whole Regency covering around 4 million hectares area of archipelago where 117 villages and 6 MPAs are scattered across the Regency.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, payment mechanisms need to represent an equitable distribution of costs and benefits in the eyes of the participating groups [1]. Fourth, it is important for local communities, in whose territories the PES arrangement is set, to benefit, for example by income accrued to local communities, job creation, or other forms of livelihood enhancement [17]. Conceptually, these design principles of PES arrangements resonate with the environmental governance literature in understanding how governance arrangements can be steered in ways that are seen by those involved as effective, participatory, equitable and transparent [23] This paper aims to contribute to our understanding of policy change in financing marine conservation tourism by analysing the Raja Ampat entrance fee as a PES governance arrangement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former refers to the general functions obtained by particular forest management patterns; the latter entails other functions related to goods and service production which can both satisfy the needs of local communities and generate additional sources of income for them. Forest management which can achieve both these ends is necessary for long term sustainability and operating and management methods which simultaneously guarantee long term sustainability and allow products and services to be translated into sources of income for local populations are therefore necessary [20].…”
Section: The Goods and Services Of Alpine Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools and mechanisms to manage the flows of utility generated by Paneveggio forest. Source own elaboration from [20,22].…”
Section: Case Study: the Forest Of Paneveggiomentioning
confidence: 99%