Payment instruments choice of Russian consumers: reasons and pain points

Abstract

Purpose The paper aims to explore reasons for choosing different payment instruments and pain points from using them in a Russian context. It proposes that given the expansion of the range of personal payment instruments, the choice for payment is now influenced by many factors, including the type of financial provider and potential benefits for consumers. Design/methodology/approach This paper is an exploratory study that uses data from the qualitative research conducted in three Russian cities (Moscow, Yekaterinburg and Saratov) based on 50 online payment diaries and 12 group discussions. It was complemented by the analysis of consumers’ posts on six relevant media platforms. Findings The results show that a bank card is a new must and people choose it for convenience, safety and access to online purchases inside and outside Russia. Cash is used out of habit or wherever cashless payments are either not free or unavailable. Reasons for smartphone pass-through wallet usage include speed, attribute of style and higher cashbacks. Research limitations/implications The limitations of the study are similar to any qualitative research and include, in particular, lack of generalization. Proposed hypotheses might be further tested quantitatively on a representative sample. Practical implications The results might help providers of financial services in creating better quality products that address consumer pain points and in developing strategies that allow for the changing preferences of consumers. Originality/value To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first such study to consider reasons for choosing and pain points from using certain payment instruments in the emerging markets, in particular, Russia.

Provoking Mobile Payment Actual Usage Behaviour in Middle East

“…Knowing and understanding what drives the consumer to choose a particular payment instrument and how different payment strategies are perceived helps financial service providers respond to changing customer expectations. Moreover, they should design their products and marketing campaigns to the needs of their current or future customers in order to gain customer loyalty and base (Semerikova, 2020).…”

The effect of cashless payments on the internet and mobile banking

“…Both the internet and mobile banking are the channel for cashless payments to be made online. They were not cashless tools like what Semerikova ( 2019 ) and Oyelami et al ( 2020 ) proclaimed.…”

The Enthusiasm of Digital Payment Services and Millennial Consumer Behaviour in Indonesia

“…Even digital wallets become the 3rd party in interbank transfers. Without issuing transfer fees or at lower costs than e-banking services (Semerikova, 2019), integration with various types of debit/credit cards is an advantage that digital wallets have today. This condition led the Government to launch a new digital wallet with direct integration from 3 state banks (Mandiri, BNI, BRI) called LinkAja.…”